X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Peterson, Presiding Justice, concurring. I concur fully in the denial of Howard Yntema’s petition for a writ of certiorari. Although there is gravity in whether the order of the trial court prohibiting a broad range of speech by a variety of people was permitted by the federal and state constitutional rights to free speech, Yntema consented to that order (and so waived whatever rights the order might otherwise have violated). But Kitty, Yntema’s new wife, was not a party to the litigation, and did not consent to the order. It seems to me that Kitty’s challenges to the order — both on free speech grounds and on due process grounds as a nonparty — are significant. And I have serious doubts about aspects of the Court of Appeals’s resolution of those challenges.[1] But Kitty has not filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, and this is not the sort of case warranting the exercise of our certiorari power sua sponte. And, in any event, as the Court of Appeals rightly noted, its review was very limited given that the trial court order on appeal is interlocutory. It may be that Kitty can more persuasively raise constitutional challenges before the trial court on remand; although the Court of Appeals’s narrow decision will be law of the case in future proceedings before the trial court and the Court of Appeals as to the issues actually decided, it does not prevent either court from considering broader issues on remand, and does not prevent our consideration of an eventual cert petition even as to the issues already decided by the Court of Appeals. I am authorized to state that Justice Warren and Justice LaGrua join in this concurral.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
May 01, 2025
Atlanta, GA

The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More

Title: Legal Counsel Reports to: Chief Executive Officer (CEO) FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remo...


Apply Now ›

Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...


Apply Now ›

d Arcambal Ousley & Cuyler Burk, LLP, a well-established women-owned litigation firm, has an opening in our Parsippany, NJ office. We of...


Apply Now ›