Filter This View

  • Harris v. SAL Fin. Servs. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-11-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Fredric Chaiken, Charlotte K. Perrell and Robert J. Kaufman Kaufman, Chaiken, Miller & Klorfein, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . G. Wayne Hillis Jr. and Aaron W. Lipson Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs LLP, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Grace E. Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, and Edward H. Lindsey Jr. Goodman, McGuffey, Aust & Lindsey, Atlanta.
    Case Number: A04A0926

    The arbitration clause in an agreement, which allowed an attorney who established a charitable trust for his client to buy and sell securities on behalf of the trust, was severable because the contr

  • Bogan v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-11-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jon A. Nixon Nixon & Nixon, Warner Robins, for appellant.
    for defendant: Kelly R. Burke, District Attorney, and Amy E. Smith, Assistant District Attorney, Perry, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1549

    The arresting officers had authority under the totality of the circumstances to make the initial investigative stop of the car in which the defendant was r

  • Eldridge v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert M. Bearden Jr., Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Howard Z. Simms, District Attorney, Macon, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1531

    No search occurred when the officer seized a gun, which was in plain view between the seat and driver's door of the defendant's car, while the officer was investigating an incorrect tag n

  • Putnam v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Naponisha L. Sivad, Dunwoody, for appellant.
    for defendant: Robert Stokely, Solicitor General, Seay VanPatten-Poulakos, Chief Assistant Solicitor General, Monica N. Hamlett, Assistant Solicitor, and Sandra N. Wisenbaker Coweta County Solicitor's Office, Newnan, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1348

    The Certificate of Calibration for the radar device used in the defendant's case was not a scientific report subject to the discovery provisions of O.C.G.A. § 17-

  • Wynn v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Donnelly University of Ga. Sch. of Law, Athens, for appellant.
    for defendant: Kenneth W. Mauldin, District Attorney, and William M. Overend, Assistant District Attorney, Athens, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1465

    The evidence supported an inference that the defendant knew or should have known that one of the vehicles parked in his yard at the time of his arrest was s

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    COVID-19 as a Trigger for Force Majeure: A Global Survey

    Authors: Lisa Richman, Shawn Helms, Jason Krieser, Matthew Cin, Amy Mahan

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Catholic Stewardship Consultants Inc. v. Ruotolo Assocs Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Victor Hawk, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Barry A. Fleming and Matthew D. DeMott Fulcher Hagler LLP, Augusta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A04A1251

    An out-of-state corporation did not engage in purposeful business activity in Georgia when it exchanged telephonic and electric correspondence with an in-state co

  • In the Interest of J. T. W.

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jason K. Hoffman, Tifton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0961

    The Court reinstated the biological mother's parental rights because DFACS failed to present any evidence that her child would be seriously affected by her continuing parental relatio

  • Gay v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections

    Publication Date: 2004-10-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: E. Wycliffe Orr Sr. Orr & Orr, Gainesville, and Ralph S. Goldberg, Decatur, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Atlanta, and Bryan F. Dorsey, Marietta, for appellees. Other party representation: Carrie L. Christie and Laura V. Benesh Rutherford & Christie LLP, Atlanta.
    Case Number: A04A0749

    Plaintiff's failure to comply with the ante litem notice requirement under O.C.G.A. § 50-21-21 was fatal to his injury claim against the Stone Mountain Memorial Associ

  • Fitzpatrick v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nicholas E. White, Perry, for appellant.
    for defendant: Alan R. Tawse Jr., Solicitor General, and Arthur J. Creque, Chief Assistant Solicitor General, Warner Robins, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A1166

    The trial court failed to determine whether the unreasonable delay in the filing of the transcript was inexcusable or was caused by the defe

  • Grinstead v. State

    Publication Date: 2004-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Adams, A. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Charles A. Aultman, Warner Robins, for appellant.
    for defendant: Kelly R. Burke, District Attorney, Amy E. Smith and Katherine K. Lumsden, Assistant District Attorneys, Perry, for appellee.
    Case Number: A04A0874

    The trial court abused its discretion in relying on only one other case to prove the reliability of the method of drug testing at