Filter This View

  • Leonard v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0943

    The defendant was entitled to an out-of-time a because he was not at fault for the failure to appoint counsel or to file a timely a

  • The Surgery Ctr. LLC v. Hughston Surgical Inst. LLC

    Publication Date: 2008-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1033

    The trial court improperly substituted its own judgment for that of the Department of Community Health in reversing the Department's denial of the appellee's application for a certificate of

  • Blanch v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1287

    The trial court did not err in admitting the defendant's prior conviction for possessing soap with intent to distribute it as crack cocaine for impeachment purposes, since the prior conviction

  • Honeycutt v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1213

    No evidence showed that defendant and his girlfriend agreed to manufacture or actually manufactured methamphet

  • Sheppard v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0703

    The record is unclear as to whether a Rule 31.3 b was held before admitting nine similar transactions and the Court could not say that the extensive testimony those similar transactions did not mea

  • Whitley v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A0887

    The defendant intentionally aided and abetted a home invasion in which the home was burglarized and the home's 16-year-old occupant was detained and robbed by use of a ha

  • Williams v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1356

    The trial court properly admitted the child victims' hearsay statements without a finding that the evidence was sufficiently reliable, since the testimony concerned the same matters detailed in

  • Turner v. State

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1407

    Although the investigating officer did not know the exact location of the shooting, he testified that the shooting took place in Fulton county, in a neighborhood around the corner from 545 Mayland A

  • Ford v. Hanna

    Publication Date: 2008-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1177

    The trial court erred with respect to child support, since the trial court ratified parties agreement to waive child support in light of fact that each parent had physical custody of one child witho

  • Memar v. Styblo

    Publication Date: 2008-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A08A1054

    The statute of repose did not bar a medical malpractice action, which was filed within the 5-year repose period, even though the real party in interest was not substituted as a proper party plaintif