Publication Date: 2005-05-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Benham, Robert
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Frank F. Middleton IV Watson, Spence, Lowe & Chambless LLP, Albany, Charles K. Reed, James B. Manley Jr., Jill C. Kuhn McKenna, Long & Aldridge LLP, William D. Barwick, Deborah M. Danzig and Carla W. McMillian Sutherland,, Asbill & Brennan LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: George W. Fryhofer III, James E. Butler Jr., Gregory R. Feagle Butler, Wooten, Overby, Fryhofer & Daugherty, Atlanta, Andrew J. Hill III Blasingame, Burch, Garrard, Bryant & Ashley, Andrew H. Marshall Begnaud & Marshall LLP, William C. Berryman Jr., Athens, and Alexander T. Galloway III Moore, Ingram, Johnson & Steele, Marietta, for appellee.
Case Number: S05A0900
Neither mandamus nor prohibition is an available remedy to seek review of a trial court's ruling, which is subject to appellate review, because the availability of judicial review is an adequate leg