Filter This View

  • Kitchen Int'l Inc. v. Evans Cabinet Corp.

    Publication Date: 2011-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William A. Trotter III and James B. Trotter Trotter Jones LLP, August, for appellant.
    for defendant: James R. Evans, Charles K. Reed and P. Michael Freed McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0362

    The trial court must conduct a hearing on damages in the plaintiff's suit for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, arising out of the defendant's alleged failure to pay plaintiff for the manufa

  • Howard v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Edwards, Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. David Miller, District Attorney, and Bradfield M. Shealy, Senior Assistant District Attorney, Valdosta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0602

    The defendant forced the driver of a soda delivery truck to drive more than six miles at gunpoint to a secluded road, which served ' " to substantially isolate the victim from protection or rescue,

  • DiMauro v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William C. Head, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles A. Spahos, Solicitor General, and Courtney L. Stewart, McDonough, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0189

    The trial court applied a subsequently overturned standard in determining whether to issue a certificate to secure appearance of an out-of-state witness to testify about the Intoxilyzer 5000 source

  • White v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John G. Edwards, Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Joseph K. Mulholland, District Attorney, and Charles E. Rooks, Assistant District Attorney, Bainbridge, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0690

    Any error in allowing an officer to testify that a digital scale found in the defendant's pants appeared to have cocaine residue on it, was harmless, given testimony that a bag found in the defendan

  • Dominguez v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kristin I. Jordan, Gainesville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Lee Darragh and Shiv Sachdeva, District Attorneys Gainesville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0328

    The combination of an unverified informant's statement, the defendant's nervousness during the traffic stop, and the fact that the defendant had committed a traffic offense did not create reasonable

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in Texas 2024

    Authors: Trey Cox, Jason Dennis

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Teal v. Thurmond

    Publication Date: 2011-07-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kimberly Charles Atlanta Legal Aid Soc'y and David A. Webster, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Kimberly B. Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0702

    Hearsay testimony could not sustain a finding that an employee violated her employer's policies and

  • Luckie v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-07-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth D. Kondritzer, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and David K. Getachew-Smith District Attorney's Office, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A11A0361

    Defendant failed to preserve fro review his sole enumeration of error regarding the prosecutor's cross-examination of a defense wi

  • Benedict v. State Farm Bank FSB

    Publication Date: 2011-04-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: C. M. Benedict, Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla., proceeded pro se. Adwoa G. Seymour Bryan Cave LLP and John C. Patton Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A10A2289

    Plaintiff failed to state a claim for intentional infliction of emotional dis because his complaint alleged neither humiliation, embarrassment, fright, extreme outrage, nor severe emotional dis

  • In the Interest of C. B., a Child

    Publication Date: 2011-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ali-Reza P. Ghanouni, Canton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Elizabeth M. Williamson Attorney General's Office, Atlanta, Jessica M. Chapman Law Office of Danny Coleman PC, Alpharetta, and Dana M. Thompson Thompson, Meier & King PC, Canton, for appellee. Other party representation: Barbara K. Nye and Darrell R. Caudill Jr., Canton.
    Case Number: A10A2082

    Testimony is not deemed hearsay where there was no objection at trial and the record does not clearly reflect that the witness' knowledge of the facts was based exclusively upon what she

  • Howard v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-03-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James K. Luttrell, Canton, for appellant.
    for defendant: James D. McDade, District Attorney, James A. Dooley, Assistant District Attorney, and Benjamin Von District Attorney's Office, Douglasville, for appellee.
    Case Number: A10A2208

    Under the circumstances, including the complexity of a multi-defendant RICO indictment, 42-month delay did not violate the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy