Filter This View

  • Hill v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-12-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John R. Greco, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Barry E. Morgan, Solicitor General, Todd H. Ashley and Jessica K. Moss, Assistant Solicitor General, Marietta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A2542

    Defendant was not in custody when she voluntarily returned to the scene of an accident in the investigating officers' patro

  • Howard v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-12-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William B. Swan Jr. Knox & Swan, Thomson, for appellant.
    for defendant: Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, and Durwood R. Davis, Assistant District Attorney, Thomson, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A2054

    The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the child molestation victim's videotaped statement which was taken at a neutral location with only the interviewer present since the child'

  • Brooks v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Morgan III, Abbeville, for appellant.
    for defendant: Denise D. Fachini, District Attorney, and Cheri L. Nichols, Assistant District Attorney, Cordele, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A2330

    Th e showed a proper chain of custody for the cocaine, even though it was left in the undercover agent's car trunk for four days, since th e traced the cocaine from defendant's' hands to t

  • Colonial Ins. Co. of Calif. v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2001-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William P. Claxton Claxton & Claxton, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Michael L. Morgan Shur, McDuffie, Williams & Morgan, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A2364

    A justiciable controversy remained, even though the insurance company sent its insured a qualified denial letter, because the insurance company defended the insured under a reservation of r

  • In the Interest of N. M. H.

    Publication Date: 2001-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Peter D. Johnson, Augusta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Shalen S. Nelson, Laura W. Hyman, Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, and Gary A. Glover Glover & Blount, Augusta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A1972

    The mother's continued alcohol abuse and failure to obtain a safe, healthy environment for her children supported the termination of her parental r

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Leveraged Buyouts

    Authors: Joseph W. Bartlett, Peter L. Korn, Jr., David J. Mittelstadt, Cathy L. Reese, Michael A. Rueda

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Johns v. Ridley

    Publication Date: 2001-11-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Terry L. Strawser and Earl J. Van Gerpen Van Gerpen & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker Jr., Attorney General, Kimberly L. Schwartz, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, and David C. Moss Mills & Moss LLC, Lawrenceville, for appellees. Amicus appellant: Bruce M. Edenfield and Evan R. Mermelstein Gray, Hedrick & Edenfield LLP, Atlanta.
    Case Number: A00A1294

    The Court of Appeals adopted the judgment of the Supreme Court that neither malice nor intent to injure could strip a state employee of immunity under the State Tort Claims Act for torts committed w

  • Abonza v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John H. Tarpley Lynch, Spears & Shuman, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, Robert M. Coker and James M. McDaniel, Assistant District Attorneys, Decatur, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A1806

    Evidence that defendant discussed the cocaine sale with the undercover detective, told the officer that the purity and weight was less than expected, removed the cocaine from a speaker in his truck

  • Milton v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Alfred Johnson, Marietta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, Dana J. Norman and Irvan A. Pearlberg, Assistant District Attorneys, Marietta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A1974

    Defendant failed to preserve his sole argument that the police exceeded the scope of his traffic stop for spe

  • Cook v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard A. Hunt, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, and Bettieanne C. Hart, Deputy District Attorney, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A1771

    The victim was approached by an armed man in a white and gray camouflage outfit, ordered to empty his pockets and get out of his car and defendant was found a short time later near the stolen vehicl

  • Ramos v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: William H. Toler III, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Keith C. Martin, Solicitor, and Evelyn P. Sandefur, Assistant Solicitor, Jonesboro, for appellee.
    Case Number: A01A1950

    The trial court did not err in declaring a mistrial after giving an Allen charge where the jury had deliberated for three hours, sent out two questions, asked to have some of the testimony replayed