• Ford Clinic Inc. v. Potter

    Publication Date: 2000-11-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eugene W. Harper Jr., Hartwell, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles R. Desiderio, Royston, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A2066

    Plaintiff had no cause of action for wrongful termination, because to the extent the parties had a contract, it was either for two years and barred by the statute of frauds or for an indefinite per

  • Felker v. Chipley

    Publication Date: 2000-11-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert B. Adams Little, Adams, Bates & Kelehear PC, Dalton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Warren N. Coppedge Jr. Coppedge & Leman PC, Dalton, for appellees.

    Case Number: A00A0887

    Plaintiffs' accountant erred in using the 16.37 percent rate of return for partnership money defendant converted and invested to calculate the plaintiffs' damages for converted money defendant did n

  • Upson County Hosp. Inc. v. Head

    Publication Date: 2000-11-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edward L. Long Jr. Willis, McKenzie & Long, LaGrange, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles W. Stephens, Stephens & Shuler, Gainesville, and W. Ashley Hawkins, Forsyth, for appellee. Other party representation: Paul E. Weathington Allen, Weathington & Reeves, Atlanta.

    Case Number: A00A1601

    P ff's professional malpractice claims in her amended comp were barred by her failure to file an expert affidavit with her original comp

  • In re Estate of Moses Slaughter Jr.

    Publication Date: 2000-11-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James B. Blackburn Jr. Wiseman, Blackburn & Futrell, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: George L. Lewis Duffy, Feemster & Lewis, Savannah, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1814

    Petitioner in probate court presented sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that her mother's husband was her biological f

  • Pope v. Pulte Home Corp.

    Publication Date: 2000-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Leon Van Gelderen, John A. Ziolo and Rex P. Cornelison III Cornelison & Van Gelderen, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Richard W. Wilson Jr. and James S. Teague Jr. Wilson, Brock & Irby, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1187

    Defendant's violation of a temporary order forbidding him from entering the plaintiff's property entitled the plaintiff to a permanent injunction for continuing tre

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Courthouse Guide 2024

    Authors: Texas Lawyer

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • Duggan v. Duggan-Schlitz

    Publication Date: 2000-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Christopher L. Casey J. Hue Henry PC, Athens, for appellant.
    for defendant: Gregory A. Daniels Daniels & Rothman PC, Athens, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1651

    Trial court had authority to extend the effective date of the victim's protective until the court could hold a full hearing on the victim's petition for a permanent protective

  • Jordon, Jones & Goulding Inc. v. Balfour Beatty Constr. Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: George D. Wenick and Peter M. Crofton Smith & Fleming, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Nathan E. Minear Moye, O'Brien, O'Rourke, Hogan & Pickert, Atlanta, Stephen W. Pickert and Brian L. Capps Moye, O'Brien, O'Rourke, Hogan & Pickert, Orlando, Fla., for appellee. Other party representation: Thomas A. Croft, Terrence L. Croft King & Croft, Keith Wiener Holland & Knight, Denval A. Stewart Office of County Attorney, and W. Hensell Harris Jr. Wasson, Sours & Harris, Atlanta.

    Case Number: A00A1043, A00A1046

    Plaintiff's failure to file an expert affidavit in support of its professional malpractice suit subjected the suit to dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a

  • In the Interest of A.G.I.

    Publication Date: 2000-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Amelia G. Pray, Austell, for appellant.
    for defendant: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Shalen A. Sgrosso, Sanders B. Deen and Laura W. Hyman, Assistant Attorneys General, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Scott P. Semrau, Marietta.

    Case Number: A00A1263

    Because the 17-year-old mother's incarceration kept her from visiting her infant, her failure to bond with the baby did not support the termination of her parental r

  • Dial v. Natalizi

    Publication Date: 2000-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David T. Markle, Atlanta, and Charles M. Cork III Reynolds & McArthur, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Gary W. Diamond Arrington & Hollowell, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1336

    Circumstantial evidence contradicting defendant's claim that his rented van was disabled on the interstate raised a jury question as to whether he could have moved the van and prevented plaintiff's

  • Bonar v. Bonar

    Publication Date: 2000-10-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Howard S. McKelvey Jr. McKelvey & Calhoun PC, Americus, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jesse G. Bowles III Bowles & Bowles, Cuthbert, for appellee.

    Case Number: A00A1739

    Trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify a Louisiana child custody order because the Louisiana court retained jurisdiction to resolve any future custody dis