Strip Clubs Sue Attorney General Over Trafficking Tax
“Nude dancing is a form of free speech protected by the Georgia and United States Constitutions,” the club execs say in a lawsuit filed in Fulton County Superior Court Friday.
November 15, 2017 at 01:43 PM
2 minute read
Strip club (Photo: John Disney/ ALM)
A tax on strip clubs set to begin next year is the target of a lawsuit alleging violation of constitutional rights.
To avoid what the suit characterizes as the state's increasingly powerful litigation trump card of sovereign immunity, the Georgia Association of Club Executives sued Attorney General Chris Carr and Department of Revenue Commissioner Lynnette Riley.
“Nude dancing is a form of free speech protected by the Georgia and United States Constitutions,” the club execs say in the lawsuit, filed in Fulton County Superior Court Friday.
The group is asking for a declaratory judgment that the tax is unconstitutional and for an injunction to stop the commissioner from collecting it and lodging prosecutions over refusals to pay it.
Legislators designed the tax to support the Safe Harbor for Sexually Exploited Children Fund and created a commission to administer it.
“The intent of the legislation is admirable; the last-minute funding mechanism created by the Georgia Legislature is unconstitutional,” the club organization's executive director, Jill Chambers, said in a news release Monday.
The organization's legal representation includes J. Tom Morgan of Decatur, a former DeKalb County district attorney, and Gary Freed and Nicholas Corser of Freed Howard.
“In passing the tax, the Georgia Legislature stated without basis that adult entertainment establishments serve as an access point for the sexual exploitation of children. Legitimate licensed clubs and GA-ACE members are highly regulated and rigorously prevent patrons under age 21 from entering their businesses,” Chambers said. “Without justification, the unconstitutional tax lumps legitimate Georgia businesses, already subject to heavy government and self-regulation, in with sex offenders, 'places of prostitution, pimping, pandering by compulsion, solicitation of sodomy, masturbation for hire, [and] trafficking of persons for sexual servitude.' Such a characterization is offensive and casts an unfounded stigma on the legitimate adult entertainment industry.”
The attorney general's communications director said the office cannot comment on pending litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Seeks to Have Georgia Election Case Dismissed, Cites Presidential Immunity
4 minute readJustices Weigh Constitutional Standard Applicable to Law Banning Trans Care
When Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Trump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250