AG Hopeful Challenges Foes to Debate Anti-Harassment Policies
Thomas S. Neuberger has challenged two Democrats to debate his policy proposal for combating sexual and racial harassment, as the nascent race for Delaware attorney general begins to heat up.
November 13, 2017 at 06:46 PM
8 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Thomas S. Neuberger has challenged two Democrats to debate his policy proposal for combating sexual and racial harassment, as the nascent race for Delaware attorney general begins to heat up.
Neuberger, a Republican attorney from The Neuberger Firm, published his first position paper in a press release Monday morning, calling for statutory reforms that he said would allow more women and minorities to present harassment cases to juries. Neuberger is the only Republican to publicly say that he is considering a bid next year to succeed Matt Denn as the state's top law enforcement official.
In the release, Neuberger floated proposed changes to the Delaware Discrimination in Employment Act, which he said gives judges too much say on whether harassment cases should proceed. And he called on his potential opponents, Tim Mullaney and state Rep. Sean Lynn, D-Dover, to a public debate on the issue, which has garnered national attention in recent weeks.
“Today, I call on Tim Mullaney Sr. and Sean Lynn to participate in a public debate on the widespread sexual harassment of women in the workplace and also the racial harassment of minorities at work, which are allowed under our inadequate Delaware Discrimination in Employment Act,” Neuberger said.
The statement was the latest sign that Neuberger is seriously considering a campaign to replace Denn, who announced earlier this year that he would not seek re-election in 2018. The open race is expected to attract the interest of big-name attorneys from both political parties.
Former AG and U.S. Attorney Charles M. Oberly III and Kathy Jennings, who served as a top prosecutor at the Delaware Department of Justice, are both rumored to be mulling a run on the Democratic side. Meanwhile, state Republicans, who express confidence that they can take the seat, have interviewed about a dozen would-be candidates to gauge their electoral potential.
However, only Mullaney, a former U.S. marshal and DOJ chief of staff, has made his campaign official. Lynn, an attorney and progressive lawmaker known for his support of comprehensive criminal justice reform, has confirmed that he is considering a bid, though he has not yet committed to running.
Mullaney declined Neuberger's invitation to debate on Monday, saying in an emailed statement: “At this point, I am not debating anyone from the Republican Party.”
In his position paper, Neuberger said he favored departing from federal law, which bars a jury from hearing harassment or discrimination claims, unless if a judge determines them to be “severe” or “pervasive.” The Delaware statute, he said, should be amended to reject the federal doctrine and ensure that the law is “generously and liberally construed.”
“It is time for our General Assembly to level the playing field for women and minorities and to make it clear under Delaware law that it is up to a jury, and not a judge, to say when such facts constitute harassment,” Neuberger said.
“Delaware should be in the forefront in protecting women and minorities here and not just tagging along with restrictive and unfair judicial constructs which allow women to be fondled and abused, and minorities to be slurred.”
Mullaney added that Delaware does not hesitate to enforce criminal statutes covering sexual and racial harassment, and he emphasized that he was committed to fighting harassment “in all forms.”
Mullaney also responded to his potential opponent with a challenge of his own.
“If Tom Neuberger or any Republican were serious about stopping the 'sexual monsters' he talks about,” Mullaney said, “he would call on his fellow Republicans to condemn the leader of their party, Donald Trump, who in [his] own words has made his views about how women should be treated quite clear.”
Lynn did not respond to calls on Monday seeking comment for this story.
Neuberger was not available for additional comment Monday afternoon. His next position paper is expected to be released in two weeks.
Thomas S. Neuberger has challenged two Democrats to debate his policy proposal for combating sexual and racial harassment, as the nascent race for Delaware attorney general begins to heat up.
Neuberger, a Republican attorney from The Neuberger Firm, published his first position paper in a press release Monday morning, calling for statutory reforms that he said would allow more women and minorities to present harassment cases to juries. Neuberger is the only Republican to publicly say that he is considering a bid next year to succeed Matt Denn as the state's top law enforcement official.
In the release, Neuberger floated proposed changes to the Delaware Discrimination in Employment Act, which he said gives judges too much say on whether harassment cases should proceed. And he called on his potential opponents, Tim Mullaney and state Rep. Sean Lynn, D-Dover, to a public debate on the issue, which has garnered national attention in recent weeks.
“Today, I call on Tim Mullaney Sr. and Sean Lynn to participate in a public debate on the widespread sexual harassment of women in the workplace and also the racial harassment of minorities at work, which are allowed under our inadequate Delaware Discrimination in Employment Act,” Neuberger said.
The statement was the latest sign that Neuberger is seriously considering a campaign to replace Denn, who announced earlier this year that he would not seek re-election in 2018. The open race is expected to attract the interest of big-name attorneys from both political parties.
Former AG and U.S. Attorney Charles M. Oberly III and Kathy Jennings, who served as a top prosecutor at the Delaware Department of Justice, are both rumored to be mulling a run on the Democratic side. Meanwhile, state Republicans, who express confidence that they can take the seat, have interviewed about a dozen would-be candidates to gauge their electoral potential.
However, only Mullaney, a former U.S. marshal and DOJ chief of staff, has made his campaign official. Lynn, an attorney and progressive lawmaker known for his support of comprehensive criminal justice reform, has confirmed that he is considering a bid, though he has not yet committed to running.
Mullaney declined Neuberger's invitation to debate on Monday, saying in an emailed statement: “At this point, I am not debating anyone from the Republican Party.”
In his position paper, Neuberger said he favored departing from federal law, which bars a jury from hearing harassment or discrimination claims, unless if a judge determines them to be “severe” or “pervasive.” The Delaware statute, he said, should be amended to reject the federal doctrine and ensure that the law is “generously and liberally construed.”
“It is time for our General Assembly to level the playing field for women and minorities and to make it clear under Delaware law that it is up to a jury, and not a judge, to say when such facts constitute harassment,” Neuberger said.
“Delaware should be in the forefront in protecting women and minorities here and not just tagging along with restrictive and unfair judicial constructs which allow women to be fondled and abused, and minorities to be slurred.”
Mullaney added that Delaware does not hesitate to enforce criminal statutes covering sexual and racial harassment, and he emphasized that he was committed to fighting harassment “in all forms.”
Mullaney also responded to his potential opponent with a challenge of his own.
“If Tom Neuberger or any Republican were serious about stopping the 'sexual monsters' he talks about,” Mullaney said, “he would call on his fellow Republicans to condemn the leader of their party, Donald Trump, who in [his] own words has made his views about how women should be treated quite clear.”
Lynn did not respond to calls on Monday seeking comment for this story.
Neuberger was not available for additional comment Monday afternoon. His next position paper is expected to be released in two weeks.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTC Goes After AI Tool That Has Capability to Mass Produce Fake Reviews
6 minute readCourt Dismisses Defamation Case by Ex-Homeland Security Official Against Fox News
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250