Del. Agrees to Pay $7.5M to Settle Prison-Insurrection Wrongful Death Suit
The Delaware Department of Correction on Friday evening announced that it had reached a $7.5 million settlement to resolve a wrongful death and workers' compensation lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center.
December 15, 2017 at 05:17 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The Delaware Department of Correction on Friday evening announced that it had reached a $7.5 million settlement to resolve a wrongful death and workers' compensation lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center.
The parties announced the details of the agreement in a joint press release from former U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. of the District of Delaware, who had been mediating the case. The parties officially stipulated in Delaware federal court to the dismissal of all claims against all individual defendants, including two former governors and high-ranking officials in the DOC.
According to the statement, 11 plaintiffs, including the family of Lt. Steven Floyd Sr., would share the payment, in exchange for a permanent release of their claims. The settlement also included a package of employment-related benefits, the statement said.
The state did not admit to any wrongdoing, and the plaintiffs did not concede that their claims were unfounded.
“The parties are settling to avoid the burden and expense that comes with protracted
litigation, and to bring closure to the matter,” they said in the press release.
Saundra Floyd, the wife of Steven Floyd, and five prison employees sued former Govs. Jack Markell, Ruth Ann Minner and DOC officials in April, two months after inmates launched a planned attack and seized control of JTVCC's Building C for more than 15 hours. Steven Floyd, a veteran correctional officer, was killed in the ordeal, and other guards were tortured, according to court documents.
The plaintiffs alleged due process violations under the 14th Amendment, accusing the former executives of hiding problems related to “severe understaffing” at the prison from lawmakers and the public, even as security there began to deteriorate.
State officials moved to dismiss the suit in June, claiming qualified and legislative immunity. Among other things, they argued that the state was under no constitutional obligation to ensure safe working conditions at the Smyrna prison.
The sides were set to argue the motions last month before U.S. District Judge Richard G. Andrews of the District of Delaware, but the hearing was scrapped at the last minute, after an attorney for Markell and Minner said the parties were actively pursuing talks in the case. The parties had previously agreed to stay discovery in the case, except for third-party discovery related to damages.
Andrews gave the parties until Friday to report back on “any issues” they would need to present to the court.
On Friday, attorneys for the state defendants said that the claims in the lawsuit lacked legal merit but that they hoped the settlement would bring closure to the victims and their families.
“It is their hope that this settlement with the Department of Correction will provide a measure of comfort to the officers, employees and their families, whose service and sacrifice should be honored by all Delawareans,” they said in a prepared text.
The plaintiffs, in a brief statement, expressed their gratitude to law enforcement and and emergency workers who responded to the scene of the takeover in February. Neither the parties nor their attorneys provided further comment on Friday.
The Floyd family and DOC employees were represented by Thomas S. Neuberger and Stephen J. Neuberger of The Neuberger Firm and Thomas C. Crumplar and Raeann Warner of Jacobs & Crumplar.
Markell and Minner were represented by C. Malcolm Cochran IV, Katharine Lester Mowery and Nicole K. Pedi of Richards, Layton & Finger.
The DOC and department officials were represented by Allison McCowan, Scott W. Perkins and James Darlington Taylor Jr. of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr.
The case was captioned Floyd v. Markell.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1King & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
- 2Nation's Largest Utility Parts Ways With CLO Who Helped It Navigate Bribery Scandal
- 3Advocates Renew Campaign for Immigrant Right to Counsel in New York
- 4From ‘Unregulated’ to ‘A Matter of Great Concern’: PFAS Regulation under Biden
- 5Public Interest Lawyers in NY Fear Rollback of Federal Loan Assistance in '25, Ask Gov. to Add $4M to State Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250