Prisoner Lawsuit Says Brass Ordered Beatings, Torture
An attorney for an inmate alleging constitutional violations in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center has accused top prison officials of ordering beatings and forming teams of officers to "terrorize" prisoners.
February 07, 2018 at 07:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
An attorney for an inmate alleging constitutional violations in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center has accused top prison officials of ordering beatings and forming teams of officers to “terrorize” prisoners.
The most recent filing in the case mirrors previous allegations by Donald Parkell, an inmate who claimed to have been taken hostage during the nearly 19-hour ordeal at the prison's C Building last February. But it also adds a new layer of specificity to Parkell's claims, as his legal team tries to avoid dismissal of the suit.
In a 20-page amended complaint, Parkell's attorney, James S. Green Sr., said that Delaware Department of Correction Commissioner Perry Phelps and the prison's former Wardens David Pierce and Phillip Parker directed correctional officers to assault inmates after authorities retook the facility and later formed teams of guards to “terrorize and torture” inmates.
“They gave orders to assault the inmates, deny them medical and psychiatric treatment, place them in solitary confinement, limit their food rations, and seize and destroy their personal property,” Green wrote. “Without discovery, except as reflected in the public record, plaintiff cannot know with certainty which defendant gave which order.”
Parker, who had served as deputy warden before the uprising, was named acting warden through May. Pierce, who was warden at the time of the takeover, has since been reassigned within the DOC to Dover Probation and Parole.
A spokeswoman for the DOC denied the allegations “flat-out,” but declined to comment further on the pending litigation.
Green, a partner with Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, did not immediately return a call Wednesday seeking comment.
Parkell, a medium-security inmate at the prison, filed a handwritten complaint in the weeks following the takeover, accusing state officials of creating a “toxic” environment that led to abuses. Prisoners at the Smyrna facility were unconstitutionally denied access to medical treatment and religious diets and were subjected to beatings in retaliation for the riot, which left veteran corrections officer Lt. Steven Floyd Sr. dead, Parkell said.
Later versions of the complaint alleged former Gov. Jack A. Markell had deliberately understaffed and failed to train correctional officers who worked there, resulting in a “pervasive disdain” between staff and prisoners that made the attack “predictable and inevitable.”
Attorneys from the Delaware Department of Justice moved to dismiss the proposed class action in November on the grounds of qualified and legislative immunity.
Joseph C. Handlon, deputy attorney general with the DOJ, argued in the motion that the “broad and undefined” allegations failed to link current and former state officials to the supposed wrongdoing, and the claims were too speculative to expose Markell and other officials to personal liability for alleged constitutional violations.
In Thursday's answering brief, Green said the defendants had acted with deliberate indifference to the safety of correctional officers and prisoners, and he sought to connect the officials directly to the alleged abuses.
“To compound its dereliction of duty, rather than protect plaintiff and the class of inmate victims following their retaking of Building C, the defendants punished them by beatings, torture, destruction of their property, deprivation of medical, psychiatric and dental care, and placing them in solitary confinement with no opportunity to be heard. That is what this case is about,” he said.
A total of 18 inmates have been charged in relation to the incident, and 16 are facing murder charges in Floyd's death.
Floyd's family and DOC staff injured in the ordeal settled a separate case against the state for more than $7.5 million in December.
The current case in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware is captioned Parkell v. Pierce.
It also names current JTVCC Warden Dana Metzger, Department of Safety and Homeland Security Secretary Robert Coupe and unnamed prison staff as defendants.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSoft-Spoken But No-Nonsense: Retired Del. Supreme Court Justice Vaughn Dead at 75
3 minute readThe Del. Supreme Court Could Make the Next Big Move in Anticompetitive Agreements. Here's How.
4 minute readSkadden Partners: String of Securities Wins Highlights Cross-Border Practice
3 minute readCorporate Bankruptcies Slow Down in Q3 as Weil, Davis Polk and Sidley Earn Major Retentions
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250