Strine Presses Budget Committee on Parking Costs for Courts' Wilmington Workers
In what has become a staple of his annual budget pitch to lawmakers, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr. again pushed for state funding to cover the cost of parking for court employees in Wilmington.
February 14, 2018 at 06:19 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Delaware state Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr.
In what has become a staple of his annual budget pitch to lawmakers, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr. again pushed for state funding to cover the cost of parking for court employees in Wilmington.
Strine used more than half of his prepared remarks on Wednesday to ask members of the General Assembly's Joint Finance Committee for the fourth time to back his demand that nearly half of all judicial branch employees no longer be forced to pay for downtown parking, which costs about $1,700 per year.
Past requests have been met with sympathy from some members of the 12-person panel, but Strine and legislators have so far been unable to reach a consensus on how best to address the proposal. The current proposal would involve purchasing a block of spots in a downtown parking garage and then distributing cards to court employees to use for work purposes only.
Strine in recent years has framed parking as an issue of fairness for court workers, the majority of whom make less than $32,000 in salary each year. However, Strine used his hour-long appearance on Wednesday afternoon to stress the toll it has taken on the court's operations, citing high turnover and low morale among court workers in New Castle County.
“None of what we do for the public can be secure in the future if we don't address the needs of our workers,” Strine told the 12-member panel. “That's our No. 1 priority.”
Strine cited court statistics that show disproportionate turnover rates for court employees in New Castle County, compared to those in Sussex and Kent counties. For the Delaware Superior Court, 86 percent of all employee separations in 2017 occurred in New Castle County, and departures from the Delaware Court of Common Pleas registered at about 70 percent, Strine said.
According the court statistics, a majority of court security officers, investigative officers and prothonotary employees in Wilmington work two jobs, and Strine said that for most workers, the money they spend on parking comes directly out of living expenses that would otherwise be spent on rent, groceries and bills.
The result, Strine said, is that many workers leave for higher-paying jobs, creating the constant need to hire and train new workers.
“If the Judiciary is a priority for our state—and we think you think it is—then surely half our workforce has to be a priority if we're going to serve the public well,” he said.
In past years, lawmakers have bristled at the request, citing concerns that court employees in Wilmington would receive a benefit not available to other state employees who work outside of the city. But Strine has argued that nearly all legislative and executive branch employees have access to free parking, while Wilmington workers are stuck with an expense exclusive to the city.
However, four Joint Finance Committee members voiced support Wednesday for Strine's proposal, which was the product of talks with the committee.
“You've spent a lot of time; you've spent a lot of effort reaching out to us. And I think you've made a very good case,” Joint Finance Committee co-chair Rep. Melanie George Smith, D-Bear, told Strine.
Rep. James Johnson, D-New Castle, said he was deeply skeptical of the idea when Strine first pitched it four years ago. But on Wednesday, Johnson was crediting the chief justice with starting to change his mind.
“You have me leaning toward that way now,” Johnson said.
Sen. Brian Bushweller, D-Dover, and Rep. Michael Ramone, R-Middle Run Valley, also expressed positive thoughts on the measure.
Strine still faced some pushback from Sen. Dave Lawson, R-Marydel, who raised concerns about parking contracts and securing the cards that would be needed to enact the plan.
“You'll have to pay for it one way or the other,” he said in a tense exchange.
Gov. John Carney has proposed a $1,000 pay raise for all state employees, but his recommended budget did not address the lingering parking issue. Strine said he was generally pleased with Carney's plan, and the judiciary would be seeking only a “modest” markup on the governor's proposal.
The governor's proposed budget did, however, embrace Strine's request for two additional vice chancellors on the Delaware Court of Chancery, and it recommended the restoration of $540,000 to fund legal services for the poor. That total represented a 10 percent cut from the $600,000 in state funding before lawmakers eliminated the appropriations during last year's budget crisis.
Strine is also seeking substantial funding in the coming years to build two new Family Court buildings in Kent and Sussex County. Carney's capital budget recommended about half of what Strine had requested for the upcoming fiscal year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250