Del. Judge Grants $41,000 in Attorney Fees to Drinker Biddle in Contract Dispute
A Delaware Superior Court judge has awarded Drinker Biddle & Reath $41,000 in attorney fees for recovering $1 million on behalf of its clients in a breach of contract case against Texas-based machining services firm Integra Services Technologies Inc.
June 25, 2018 at 06:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Delaware Superior Court judge has awarded Drinker Biddle & Reath $41,000 in attorney fees for recovering $1 million on behalf of its clients in a breach of contract case against Texas-based machining services firm Integra Services Technologies Inc.
The ruling from Judge Paul R. Wallace resolved a $6,000 difference between both sides as to how much Drinker Biddle attorneys Todd C. Schiltz and Stephen S. Herst were owed for successfully litigating the case. In February, Wallace granted the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and ordered Integra to pay Dean Bellmoff and Beatrice Salazar the remaining balance on two promissory notes, which originally came due in August 2017.
In the months that followed, however, the parties failed to reach an agreement on reasonable attorney fees, leaving the issue up to Wallace to decide.
Bellmoff and Salazar, who each formerly owned a 25 percent stake in Integra, had argued they were entitled to $41,000 to pay Schiltz and Herst for the 68 total hours they had worked on the case. Integra and its Hogan McDaniel attorneys countered that the request was excessive in comparison to its own legal costs of roughly $32,000, and asked the court to approve no more than $35,000 to its opponents.
On June 22, Wallace said the discrepancy stemmed from an 11-hour gap in the time each legal team spent working on the case, and he cited to Delaware's so-called “pizza principle,” which holds that “it is more time consuming to clean up the pizza thrown at the wall than it is to throw it.”
“No doubt, Bellmoff and Salazar's counsel had to spend time cleaning up Integra's thrown pizza: reviewing and responding to each of the affirmative defenses Integra chucked in to the litigation,” he wrote in an eight-page memorandum opinion and order.
In his ruling, Wallace refused to conduct an hour-by-hour accounting of Drinker Biddle's work, but said the request from Bellmoff and Salazar was reasonable in light of the services rendered throughout the eight-month case.
“In sum, their counsel successfully secured a million-dollar award and charged less than 5 percent of that sum to do so,” Wallace wrote. “Not bad. Certainly not unreasonable.”
Schiltz, a partner in Drinker Biddle's Wilmington office, did not return a call Monday afternoon seeking comment on the case. Attorneys for Integra were not immediately available to comment.
Integra was represented by Ronald R. Rossi of Kasowitz Benson Torres in New York and Garvan F. McDaniel of Hogan McDaniel in Wilmington.
The case was captioned Bellmoff v. Integra Services Technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Judges Zero In on Constitutional Challenges to Medicare Drug Pricing Program
Justices: Can Delaware Courts Put a Price Tag on Corporate Move to Nevada?
4 minute readSupreme Court Asked If Ellison's Plans Affected Oracle's NetSuite Acquisition
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250