PTAB Chief Judge Taking New Role at USPTO
David Ruschke will become a senior adviser, giving PTO Director Andrei Iancu the opportunity to name his own chief of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
August 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Chief Judge David Ruschke of the Patent and Trial Appeal Board
The chief judge of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is taking a new role within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the agency has confirmed.
David Ruschke “has graciously accepted the position of Senior Advisor to Patents,” PTO Director Andrei Iancu said in a statement Wednesday. Effective Sept. 2, The new position will serve as a bridge between the PTAB and the patent examination side of the PTO. “I look forward to working with David to improve intra-agency cooperation,” Iancu said in the statement.
The move gives Iancu the opportunity to place his own person at the top of a division that's been a lightning rod in the patent world. Formerly the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, the PTAB was reorganized by the America Invents Act into a streamlined forum for challenging patent validity. The PTAB has been popular with companies sued for patent infringement but came under attack almost immediately from patent owners and others for being too aggressive in weeding out invalid patent claims.
Former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader dubbed it a “death squad” for patent rights and bills that would defang the board have been regularly introduced in Congress. At a hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court last November, Chief Justice John Roberts questioned whether Ruschke should even be called a “judge.”
Ruschke was a longtime Medtronic IP attorney who took over from Acting Chief Judge Nathan Kelley in 2016. Under his leadership, the “kill rate” in AIA proceedings has dropped, and Ruschke personally signed onto an opinion last fall that clamped down on serial petitions, settling a major complaint among patent owners.
The perception in some segments of the bar is that may not have been enough for Iancu, a former Irell & Manella partner who has promised to strike a balance at the PTO that promotes innovation.
Ruschke “had the hardest job in patent law,” said Jonathan Stroud, chief IP counsel of Unified Patents. “He was in the middle of a lot of different interests, and he managed to do an honorable job, maintaining his integrity.”
➤➤ Get IP news and commentary straight to your inbox with Skilled in the Art by Scott Graham. Sign up here.
Latham & Watkins partner Bob Steinberg, a co-founder of the PTAB Bar Association, credited Ruschke with the outreach that was needed to get the bar group up and running. “I thought he did a great job,” Steinberg said.
Others noted that Ruschke revealed in a suit against his former employer, Medtronic, that he has a chronic heart condition, and that the job of PTAB chief judge is demanding, with much cross-country travel required.
Ruschke did not respond to an email seeking comment.
PTAB veterans Scott Boalick and Jacqueline Wright Bonilla will serve as acting chief judge and acting deputy chief, respectively.
Ruschke is the second high-profile member of PTO leadership to take a new position this summer. Kelley, the PTO's solicitor, left the agency a few weeks ago, saying it was time to try something new. The agency's former acting director, Joseph Matal, is serving as acting solicitor in the interim.
Iancu's announcement said that Ruschke's new position will help coordinate between PTAB and the Office of the Commissioner for Patents. It doesn't offer many more specifics, though former PTAB member Neil Smith speculated that Ruschke could get involved in new procedures for amending patent claims during AIA proceedings.
Smith notes that on an outreach tour this summer, the PTAB began requesting feedback on whether patent examiners should get involved in the claim amendment process. “It seemed like an unusual and difficult-to-implement process,” Smith said, but it might be a window into what the PTO is thinking with Ruschke's new position.
Correction: This story has been updated to correct Jonathan Stroud's title.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250