Wilmington, Former City Officials Targeted in Lawsuit Over Deadly Fire
The city officials are accused of implementing a staffing policy that withheld needed water.
August 16, 2018 at 06:20 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The families of three firefighters killed in a 2016 blaze and several of their injured colleagues filed a civil rights and wrongful death lawsuit against the city of Wilmington on Thursday accusing four former officials of constitutional violations in enacting a controversial policy that allegedly prevented needed water from arriving.
The 75-page complaint, filed in Delaware federal court, blamed former Mayors Dennis P. Williams and James M. Baker, as well as former fire Chiefs Anthony S. Goode and William Patrick Jr., of implementing a citywide policy known as “rolling bypass.”
According to the lawsuit, the officials ignored warnings about the policy from city council members and a firefighters union. The policy mandated that fire engines be shut down in the event of staffing shortages instead of paying overtime to firefighters to work the shift. The lawsuit seeks to hold the former officials liable for “substantive due process” violations under the state-created danger doctrine.
“Blood is on the hands of Mayors Baker and Williams who despite repeated warnings knowingly caused the deaths of three firefighting heroes who gave their lives rushing into a burning building seeking to rescue civilians believed trapped in the inferno. They were warned repeatedly that deaths would follow, but with a cold heart they continued their shocking policies,” plaintiffs' co-counsel Thomas S. Neuberger said in a statement.
Attorneys announced the lawsuit Thursday morning at a press conference in Wilmington.
The filing stems from a Sept. 24, 2016, residential fire in Canby Park, which killed Lt. Christopher Leach and senior firefighters Jerry Fickes and Ardythe Hope, and seriously injured three others. The closest engine to the blaze was shut down, leaving the firefighters without the water they needed to combat the blaze in the rear basement of the home, according to the complaint.
Leach died on the scene, and Fickes succumbed to his injuries later that night. Hope, who joined the Wilmington Fire Department in 1993, died several months later from thermal burns. Current Mayor Mike Purzycki said a grand jury has charged a suspect with multiple counts of murder and arson in connection with the fire.
The lawsuit seeks punitive and compensatory damages, and a jury trial against the city and the individual defendants.
“All this would have been prevented if the city had let the firefighters do their jobs and get water to the fire scene as quickly as possible,” Neuberger said.
Purzycki, who is not named in the complaint, responded Thursday afternoon with a strongly worded statement that accused the plaintiffs' attorneys of misrepresenting the facts of the case in order to obtain a “quick cash settlement” from the city.
“If so, they are profoundly mistaken. I assure you that Wilmington will aggressively defend this case,” he said.
Purzycki said the city was “very sad about the loss of our firefighters,” and expected to pay more than $11 million to the families and the surviving firefighters to cover medical costs and related benefits.
He denied allegations that rolling bypass and staffing decisions contributed to the tragedy.
“It is easy to file a lawsuit, and a complaint is just a list of allegations written by the plaintiffs' lawyers,” Purzycki said. “Those allegations are not facts, and they are not evidence. As the plaintiffs and their lawyers will learn, facts matter. The actual facts in this case differ sharply from the narrative contained in the complaint.”
The complaint was filed by attorneys from The Neuberger Firm and Jacobs & Crumplar, the two Wilmington law firms that last year sued state officials over alleged lapses that led to the deadly prison takeover at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center in Smyrna. The state settled that lawsuit in December, agreeing to pay more than $7.5 million to the victims and their families.
Thursday's lawsuit alleges that the officials used their positions to create a foreseeable risk of injury and death, and it cites repeated warning from the Wilmington firefighters union that the rolling bypass policy placed firefighters in harm's way.
Many of the allegations target Goode, who served as the fire chief under Williams from 2013 to January 2017. According to the complaint, Goode was incensed by criticisms over his policies and threatened to punish firefighters for speaking out. The filing accuses Goode of acting with “malice” and details multiple instances in which he was hostile toward the city's firefighters, telling them in meetings that, “I don't care if you die in a fire.”
Goode, who is no longer with the fire department, was indicted in December 2017 by a state grand jury on four unrelated felony charges, including racketeering and theft. Those charges are still pending.
The plaintiffs are represented by Thomas S. Neuberger and Stephen J. Neuberger of the Neuberger Firm, and Thomas C. Crumplar and Raeann Warner of Jacobs & Crumplar.
The case, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, is captioned Speakman v. Williams.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250