Dover Attorney Sues Del. Officials Alleging Torture in Wake of Prison Uprising
A Dover attorney has filed a lawsuit against Gov. John Carney, prison officials and staff on behalf of more than 100 inmates who said they were tortured and abused in the wake of last year's uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, which left a corrections officer dead.
November 01, 2018 at 06:48 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Dover attorney has filed a lawsuit against Gov. John Carney, prison officials and staff on behalf of more than 100 inmates who said they were tortured and abused in the wake of last year's uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, which left a corrections officer dead.
Stephen A. Hampton said the 80-page civil complaint, filed Tuesday in Delaware Superior Court, came as the result of the state's refusal to address longstanding problems at the prison that culminated in a violent “revolt” in February 2017.
Hampton, a partner at Grady & Hampton, sent a letter to Carney last March describing the “orgy of gratuitous violence against every inmate” in JTVCC's C-Building, and threatened litigation if the governor did not take action to end ongoing abuses. The demand was referred to the Delaware Department of Corrections, eventually leading to the lawsuit.
“If as it appears, the governor has no remedy available to end torture in Delaware prisons other than to forward the complaints to DOC, it can rightly be said that there is no state department or agency that will protect Delaware inmates from being tortured in Delaware prisons,” Hampton said in a response to the governor's office.
A spokesman for Carney declined to comment on the lawsuit, citing pending litigation. A spokeswoman for the DOC did not return a call seeking comment.
In the filing, Hampton blamed the prison takeover on deteriorating conditions at JTVCC, including a lack of health care, educational programs, drug-rehabilitation services and a culture of violence and disrespect directed at inmates. The complaint quotes extensively from prisoners' own accounts of state's emergency response and the following weeks, in which inmates said they were beaten and deprived of essentials, property and access to mental health services and sometimes sexually abused by officers.
The inmates said they were subjected to shakedowns and strip searches, and that guards, while laughing, had forced them to touch their genitals and then stick their fingers in their mouths. Multiple inmates described having objects shoved in their anus. One prisoner described the act as sexual assault.
“It was a shakedown at gunpoint,” another said of cell searched conducted on March 9, 2017. “I saw puddles of blood outside on the sidewalk in front of the entrance to W building. Inmates continued to be pepper sprayed and beaten that entire day and into the night. Sick calls are answered in weeks, grievances in months.”
According to the lawsuit, prisoner complaints at the prison are regularly ignored, and DOC supervisors do not discipline officers who harm inmates. Hampton, who has three other lawsuits pending against the DOC, said that Delaware's governors have also ignored criticisms that the state is simply “warehousing inmates,” without providing health and rehabilitation services.
Hampton said that officials had been warned that “something bad was going to happen,” but did nothing before the 18-hour siege.
“The fact that it blew up is not a surprise,” Hampton said in an interview. “Everybody knew it.”
Two corrections officers were badly beaten during the ordeal, and another officer and a prison counselor were taken hostage. Authorities discovered the body of Lt. Steven Floyd under a mattress and other debris after retaking control of the building around 5:30 am Feb. 2, 2017.
Sixteen inmates are accused of murder, riot, conspiracy, assault and kidnapping. Two more have been charged, but not accused of murder.
A criminal trial is currently underway in Wilmington for the first three prisoners charged in the case. The state plans to try the rest of the defendants over the next four months.
The civil case is captioned Adger v. Carney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250