DOJ Drops Charges for Most Remaining Defendants in Murder Trial Stemming From Prison Uprising
The DOJ said in a statement Friday that it would only proceed with charges against three of the nine inmates still waiting to stand trial in Wilmington.
March 15, 2019 at 03:43 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The Delaware Department of Justice has dropped charges against most of the remaining defendants in a murder case stemming from the 2017 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, which left veteran corrections officer Lt. Steven Floyd dead.
The DOJ said in a statement Friday that it would only proceed with charges against three of the nine inmates still waiting to stand trial for murder and riot in Wilmington. The decision came after two trials produced just one murder conviction against seven defendants who had been tried in the case.
“Prosecutors in the Vaughn trials—who are among the department's most experienced and who have done a remarkable job in an exceedingly difficult case—have evaluated the evidence against the remaining defendants in light of the testimony in the first two trials and the results of those trials,” the statement said.
“Prosecutors have notified the court that the state will only continue forward with charges against Roman Shankaras, Lawrence Michaels, Alejandro Rodriguez-Ortiz.”
Shankaras, who was severed from the first trial late last year, will be tried in April, the DOJ said. A trial for Michaels and Rodriguez-Ortiz is planned for October.
So far, only one defendant, Dwayne Staats, has been found guilty of felony murder charges during a Wilmington trial late last year. Staats, who admitted to planning the takeover to protest prison conditions, was also found guilty of riot, kidnapping, assault and conspiracy.
Another inmate tried alongside Staats was found not guilty of the most serious charge of murder, though he was convicted on the four lesser crimes. A third inmate, who denied any involvement in the uprising, was acquitted on all charges.
A second trial resulted in no guilty verdicts against any of the four inmates tried earlier this year.
According to the announcement, prosecutors had discussed the decision the victims, but said they had an obligation to only proceed with prosecutions where “there is a reasonable likelihood of a conviction at trial based on the evidence.”
“Obtaining a measure of justice for victims is of paramount importance in all prosecution decisions,” the statement said.
The DOJ declined to comment any further, citing the cases that remained pending.
Prosecutors in the case had described the “coordinated violence” of the 18-hour ordeal and identified Staats as having taken credit for masterminding a plot to overtake the prison's C-Building. Under the theory of accomplice liability, prosecutors argued that the other defendants could be held criminally liable for Floyd's murder because it was a foreseeable result of the riot.
However, attorneys familiar with the case have cited a lack of physical evidence and unreliable witness testimony as having undermined the state's case before the juries.
Three guards and a prison counselor were taken hostage during the ordeal. Floyd, a veteran corrections officer, was found face-down and handcuffed under a pile of debris after the building was finally cleared in the early hours of Feb. 2.
In total, 18 inmates were charged in connection with the takeover, and 16 had faced murder charges.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJurden Announces 2025 Retirement, Capping 24 Years on Superior Court
3 minute readRare Opposition to Proposed Del. Corporate Law Changes Is Voiced to House Committee
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1What Are Forbidden Sexual Relations With Clients?
- 2AEDI Takeaways: Demystifying Hype, Changing Caselaw & Harvey’s CEO Talks State of Industry
- 3New England Law | Boston Announces New Dean
- 4Nordic Capital Plans to Acquire IP Management Solutions Provider Anaqua
- 5Criminalization of Homelessness Is Not the Solution
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250