McKool Smith Win Puts Insurer on the Hook for $14M Settlement
After a now-defunct Tennessee probation company settled a class action for $14 million last year, its parent sued Illinois Union Insurance for the money. The insurer denied coverage, but a Delaware judge ruled Tuesday that a claimed exclusion does not apply.
July 11, 2019 at 03:24 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The insurer for a now-defunct private probation company in Tennessee has lost its bid to avoid covering more than $14 million the business paid to settle a 2015 class action accusing it of squeezing money from misdemeanor probationers through additional fines, fees and threats of jail.
Pathways Community Corrections Inc. and its parent, Providence Service Corp., settled the claims last year for more than $14.3 million, after spending more than $1 million in legal fees, and demanded that Illinois Union Insurance pony up the money under a $15 million excess coverage policy.
Illinois Union denied coverage, arguing that an earlier settlement of a 2011 lawsuit against Pathways involved “related professional incidents” and was thus excluded under the policy's terms. That suit involved claims that Pathways was illegally charging probationers a $5 “picture fee” and inflated supervisory fees, and settled the year it was filed, which was before the Illinois Union policy was purchased.
Providence filed a declaratory judgment action in Delaware Superior Court, and on Tuesday Judge Mary Johnston ruled that the exclusion does not let Illinois Union off the hook.
Johnston's ruling was filed under seal, but an excerpt released by McKool Smith, whose lawyers represent Providence, said the judge found the two incident so unrelated that to allow the exclusion to bar coverage would “render all claims involving [Pathways Community Corrections'] professional services 'related,'” resulting in coverage that was essentially “illusory.”
“It would be difficult, if not impossible, to find unrelated incidents in the context of providing probation services,” Johnston's order is quoted as saying.
Providence's lawyers include Robin L. Cohen, Adam Ziffer and Michelle Migdon of McKool's New York office and Kenneth Nachbar, John DiTomo and Sabrina Hendershot of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell in Wilmington. They were not at liberty to discuss the case.
Illinois National's counsel includes Deborah Minkoff and Abby Sher of Cozen O'Connor in Philadelphia and Joseph Bellew of White & Williams in Wilmington. They did not respond to requests for comment Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRecent Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Misappropriation of Special Needs Trust Funds
Bumping the Bump-Up Exclusion: A Policyholder's Guide to Resisting Improper Coverage Denials
12 minute readLitigation Leaders: Cohen Ziffer Chair Talks the Advantages of Being on the Policyholder Side of the Insurance Recovery Practice
McElroy Deutsch Files Complaint for MetLife to Determine Policy's Proper Beneficiaries
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250