Cyber Scammers Target Morris James, Faking UK Affiliation
Delaware-based Morris James warned this week that a website borrowing real details about the firm was thoroughly phony.
August 02, 2019 at 02:14 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A screenshot from the Morris James Solicitors website, which is unaffiliated with Delaware-based U.S. firm Morris James.
Delaware-based midsize law firm Morris James has found that its name is being used by a website claiming to belong to a group of solicitors in the United Kingdom affiliated with the Delaware firm.
The problem is, there is no such group.
Morris James posted a notification on its own website and social media Thursday warning that the website www.morrisjamessolicitors.com “is NOT associated with Morris James LLP.”
In its announcement, the law firm said it has reported the website to the FBI, the Action Fraud team of the U.K. police and the Solicitors Regulation Authority in the U.K. Morris James is also “taking steps with the website host to persuade them to take down the website,” the firm said.
Morris James declined to comment further on the incident.
The solicitors site uses logos and coloring similar to Morris James’ branding, and it makes a reference to the real firm’s main office in Delaware.
However, Morris James noted, the phone numbers listed on the site will not connect a caller with any of the firm’s U.S. offices, and no one answering those lines will be a representative to the firm.
The impostor website says Morris James Solicitors has an office at 1 Waterhouse Square, 138 Holborn in London, which appears to be the site of a WeWork shared office space. A call to the Delaware phone number listed on the impostor site leads to the message “the phone number you have dialed is unreachable.”
According to GoDaddy.com’s WHOIS database, the impostor site’s domain is registered to Shinjiru Technology Sdn Bhd, which appears to be a Malaysian web hosting entity.
Morris James’ situation is reminiscent of other instances of law firm or lawyer identity theft in recent years.
In 2017, the photos of lawyers from Brydon Swearengen & England in Missouri were used to create a website for a fake firm called Wesley & McCain. The phony firm’s website also listed the address of actual Pittsburgh law firm Robb Leonard Mulvihill as its own street address.
A Houston lawyer for Jackson Walker found in 2017 that his headshot appeared on the website of a fictitious firm, Walsh & Padilla.
Preventing such theft is virtually impossible, privacy experts have said, given that the entire purpose of a website is to disseminate useful information about the firm. The problem arises when that information is used improperly.
But unlike other businesses that engage in e-commerce, law firms usually do not collect payment information on their websites. So establishing the motives of such a hack can be difficult.
In the Wesley & McCain instance, the fake firm was found out because it sent a letter to Amazon.com alleging that it was selling a patent-infringing product.
Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Womble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
4 minute read
Fed Judiciary Panel Mulls Authority to Ban In-State Bar Admission Requirements
The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
