Delaware Company's $3M Suit Against 'Cannabis King' Will Test Commercial Rights in Flailing Economy
The case will test how far commercial plaintiffs can go to seek relief in an economy ravaged by COVID-19.
April 10, 2020 at 02:29 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Meland Russin & Budwick partner Eric Ostroff in Miami is taking on a man who calls himself the California Cannabis King, with a lawsuit alleging the marijuana entrepreneur illegally used a $3 million business loan to buy condominium units at Fontainebleau in Miami Beach and SLS Brickell.
The case will test how far commercial plaintiffs can go to seek relief in an economy ravaged by COVID-19, Ostroff said.
"I think that particularly in the current economic circumstances, lawyers who represent companies that are creditors are going to want to pay careful attention to what remedies creditors can use to be made whole," Ostroff said. "And here, under Delaware law, not just seeking a judgment for breaching a promissory note, this case seeks to take advantage of other remedies given to creditors of a company that, according to the allegations, is insolvent.
Ostroff represents Delaware company GIA Investments LLC, which claims it was never repaid after loaning $3 million to California cannabis production and distribution companies Cannafornia Holdings Inc. and California New Wave I LLC, which are now allegedly drowning in debt.
The complaint points the finger at CEO and self-professed king of cannabis—real name Paul King—for allegedly using the companies as "his personal piggy bank."
King has sold recreational and medical cannabis products since 2017, and even sponsored the formation of a Mixed Martial Arts team, the Cannafornia Fight Team, in partnership with Ultimate Fighting Champion welterweight champion Colby Covington.
Cannafornia's website says its goal is to bring awareness to the healing properties of marijuana amid an opioid epidemic, "in hopes that more people will put down the pills and pick up the plant."
|Piercing the Veil
The loan matured in December 2019, according to the suit, which said the companies had Florida offices and that King lives in Sunny Isles.
The defendants are accused of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfer and unjust enrichment.
King's personal attorney in Los Angeles—Stephen Boren of Boren Osher & Luftman—did not respond to a request for comment. But he has claimed in court pleadings that the loan documents were fake, according to the complaint, which included an email in which Boren called the lawsuit meritless and malicious.
Ostroff alleges New Wave and Cannafornia are alter egos, which commingled funds, had common management and didn't observe corporate formalities.
"We're seeking to pierce the corporate veil between those two companies," he said.
But the biggest obstacle, in Ostroff's view, will be figuring out the logistics of litigating during a global pandemic, as all depositions, hearings and discovery will have to be done remotely.
"It's a challenge for all lawyers to litigate and move a case forward in this environment," Ostroff said.
Ostroff has also asked the court to appoint a receiver, who would take over management of the companies while the lawsuit plays out.
"Until the debt to my company is paid, an independent individual should be managing this company, not in the best interests of management but in the best interests of creditors and of shareholders," Ostroff said.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas is set to preside over the case in the complex business litigation division.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250