Statewide Judicial Emergency Extended Again, Bar Exam Postponed
"The goal is to work down each court's non-trial casework so we are prepared for increasing court operations when health and science experts tell us it is safe and reasonable to do so," Chief Justice Collins Seitz Jr. said in a press release.
May 15, 2020 at 12:41 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
The Delaware Supreme Court on Thursday announced that it has extended statewide judicial emergency to mid-June and rescheduled the July Delaware bar exam for mid-September.
The announcement and order came on the day the court's previous order extending the emergency was set to expire and a little less than a week after Gov. John Carney extended Delaware's state of emergency until May 31. Carney also set June 1 as the start of Phase 1 of the state's economic reopening.
The latest extension means state court facilities will remain closed to the public through June 13.
The bar exam, which was originally scheduled for July 27 to 29, has been rescheduled for Sept. 9 to 11. The order also allows for anyone who was registered to take the July bar exam but chooses not to take the exam in September to receive a refund of their application fee.
"Our state continues to operate under the governor's emergency declarations," Chief Justice Collins Seitz Jr. said in a press release.
"Those restrictions—vital to protecting the health and safety of Delawareans—do not presently allow us to increase activity in judicial facilities. Therefore, I have entered an order today extending the judicial emergency declaration until June 13, 2020. As I have noted before, with the exception of trials, all state courts continue to use video and audio platforms to conduct as much court business as possible. The goal is to work down each court's non-trial casework so we are prepared for increasing court operations when health and science experts tell us it is safe and reasonable to do so."
The order requires each courthouse to continue to provide a method, such as a dropbox or mailing address, for attorneys and members of the public to file paper documents if they do not have access to electronic filing. The order also requires courts to continue holding nonemergency and nonessential telephonic arguments and hearings or videoconferences.
According to the press release, the Court Reopening Committee, led by Superior Court Judge William C. Carpenter Jr. and staffed by state judicial officers and court employees, judicial system partners and an infectious disease expert, is working on a plan to gradually reopen court facilities. The release said the committee is aiming to have a final report and recommendation this month, with a possible "first phase" limited reopening beginning in June.
Read the Order:
Read the Press Release:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllI'll Take That Bet: Hedge Funds Think Musk Will Be Forced to Buy Twitter
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Partner Co-Launches Startup Aiming to Transform Fund Formation Process
- 2How the Court of Public Opinion Should Factor Into Litigation Strategy
- 3Debevoise Lures Another SDNY Alum, Adding Criminal Division Chief
- 4Cooley Promotes NY Office Leader to Global Litigation Department Chair
- 5What Happens When Lateral Partners’ Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250