Dover Lifts Curfew, Remains Under State of Emergency
Dover criminal defense attorney Adam Windett and representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union of Delaware submitted letters to Christiansen criticizing the curfew, asserting it put those in the city at risk of having their First Amendment rights violated .
June 15, 2020 at 03:17 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Dover's curfew ended Saturday, 13 days after Mayor Robin R. Christiansen first imposed it under a citywide state of emergency.
Christiansen wrote in the executive declaration signed June 13 that the decision to rescind the curfew was made "in the best interest of the City of Dover's constituents and local businesses" based on information provided by Dover Chief of Police Thomas Johnson Jr.
The declaration did not include further details, Johnson was unavailable for comment Monday afternoon, and Christiansen did not respond to requests for comment on his decision to lift the curfew.
The curfew from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m. began May 31 and was set to continue indefinitely. While the curfew is no longer in effect, the state of emergency under which the Dover Code of Ordinances gave Christiansen authority to instate the curfew will remain in place until further notice, the June 13 declaration stated.
On June 11 and 12, respectively, Dover criminal defense attorney Adam Windett and representatives from the American Civil Liberties Union of Delaware submitted letters to Christiansen criticizing the curfew, asserting it put those in the city at risk of having their First Amendment rights violated and was unwarranted considering more populous cities across the country had ended their curfews significantly earlier.
Though the May 31 declaration that put the curfew in place stated it was voluntary, Windett said June 12 he was concerned that keeping a broad curfew in place could have the potential to lead to law enforcement confronting people out past curfew who under normal circumstances would not have cause to be stopped.
"This action is taken with the highest regard for the civil and constitutional rights, as well as, the safety of all our citizens," the executive declaration concluded.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJurden Announces 2025 Retirement, Capping 24 Years on Superior Court
3 minute readRare Opposition to Proposed Del. Corporate Law Changes Is Voiced to House Committee
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250