Black Job-Seeker Accuses Sallie Mae of Racial Discrimination in Employment
Attorney Michelle Allen said her client's Gilder's experience with Sallie Mae qualifies as racial discrimination because the company's consideration of criminal histories brought "racial disparities in the criminal justice system into the employment process."
July 09, 2020 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Black job applicant is seeking $5 million in federal court from Sallie Mae, alleging that when the bank asked about criminal histories for prospective employees, it practiced a form of racial discrimination.
Willie Gilder, of Middletown, whose offer of employment with Newark-headquartered Sallie May was rescinded in 2017 and who was granted a right to sue notice by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission last year, is seeking class certification for his lawsuit filed Wednesday in the District of Delaware, which he says is representative of policies that have disparately affected African American applicants.
According to the complaint, Gilder applied for a job as a collector with Sallie Mae in September 2017. The following month, he was interviewed and offered the job via a letter stating his employment, tentatively scheduled to start that November, was contingent upon him passing a background check.
After the background check was completed, Gilder reportedly gave Sallie Mae court documents showing that an earlier drug-related arrest, which did not result in his conviction, had been expunged from his record. In December, Sallie Mae sent Gilder a letter saying his employment had been terminated. Gilder, according to the complaint, found Sallie Mae had reported to the Department of Labor that that decision was made based on a manslaughter conviction from 25 years earlier.
On July 5, 2018, Gilder filed a charge of discrimination with the Delaware Department of Labor, which issued a preliminary report in April 2019. A year later, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued Gilder a right to sue notice. His complaint filed this week asserts Sallie Mae's "discriminatory background check policy and practice" is in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The complaint argued Gilder's manslaughter conviction had no effect on his ability to perform tasks associated with the job he was offered. His suit is filed both as an individual and as a class action on behalf of all Black persons who were hired or offered employment with Sallie May but whose employment status changed based on their race and Sallie Mae's policies involving background histories.
In moving for class certification, Gilder's attorney, Michelle D. Allen of Allen & Associates, wrote in the complaint that Gilder's experience with Sallie Mae qualifies as racial discrimination because the company's use of background histories as an isolated factor in making employment decisions has adversely affected Gilder and other African American people across the United States, "importing the racial disparities in the criminal justice system into the employment process."
"Sallie Mae Bank's policy and practice of disqualifying job applicants with convictions from employment has a disparate impact on plaintiff and the class and is neither job related nor consistent with any business necessity," Allen wrote.
Allen did not immediately respond for comment on the case Thursday, and Sallie Mae had not reported having legal representation.
An email from Sallie Mae's press office said the company would not comment on pending litigation.
In addition to consequential, nominal and other damages, Gilder is requesting a jury trial and for a court to declare Sallie Mae's criminal background policies to be in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFTX Estate Seeks to Recoup $1.76B From Binance, Plus Exec 'Piggy Bank' Payouts
3 minute readWells Fargo Seeks Declaratory Judgment Against 'YGC' Debt Collection Copyright Claim
4 minute readAntitrust Lawsuit Alleges Scheme to Block Digital-Wallet Competitors, Monopolize Cash Access at US Casinos
Securities Litigation Cases Continued to Decline Nationally in 2023, Report Finds
Trending Stories
- 1Fulton Judge Weighs Whether to Order Fani Willis to Comply With Lawmakers' Subpoenas Over Trump Case
- 2Lawyers Drowning in Cases Are Embracing AI Fastest—and Say It's Yielding Better Outcomes for Clients
- 3Judge Rises to Tifton Superior Court Bench
- 4'It's Like They Lynched You:' Law Professor's Discrimination Claim Reaches High Court
- 5New Teeth for Anti-SLAPP Statute? Absolute Immunity for Union Grievance Proceedings
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250