Delaware Cancels In-Person Bar Exam, Citing Health Concerns, Travel for Out-of-State Takers
Of specific concern, Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. noted, was the fact that almost 60% of those scheduled to sit for the bar exam would be traveling from other states to do so, with some coming from areas designated as COVID-19 hot spots or subject to quarantine restrictions in their home states.
July 24, 2020 at 04:42 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Delaware's 2020 state bar exam has been canceled, Supreme Court Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. announced Friday.
The decision to cancel the in-person exam, which was earlier rescheduled from July to September and was planned to be held at the state fairgrounds in Harrington to allow for social distancing between test takers, was made in response to ongoing concerns about the potential spread of COVID-19, Seitz said.
Instead of sitting for the exam, those hoping to be admitted to Delaware's bar are expected to be allowed to practice law temporarily and under supervision. The Supreme Court and Board of Bar Examiners are reportedly working on a temporary limited practice rule.
"The health and safety of all involved in the exam is our first priority. The court and the board had hoped that the temporary relocation of the bar exam to the Delaware State Fairgrounds in Harrington and the use of a wide array of safety procedures consistent with state and CDC guidelines would allow us to hold an in-person exam this year," Seitz said. "But we are not where we hoped to be from a public health standpoint. The pandemic continues to evolve, and it is unclear how well the virus will be contained by September."
Of specific concern, Seitz noted, was the fact that almost 60% of those scheduled to sit for the bar exam would be traveling from other states to do so, with some coming from areas designated as COVID-19 hot spots or subject to quarantine restrictions in their home states.
"I commend the chief justice and the Supreme Court and the bar authorities for this wise decision," said Rodney A. Smolla, dean of Widener University Delaware Law School. "The health and safety of the candidates is the most important consideration. Although it's a difficult decision, I think it was an eminently prudent and wise one."
A growing number of jurisdictions during the past month have canceled their in-person July or September bar exams, citing rising COVID-19 cases. But unlike Delaware, most of them have unveiled plans to administer online bar exams instead. Among the jurisdictions that now plan to give an abbreviated online bar exam prepared by the National Conference of Bar Examiners on Oct. 5 and 6 are New York, California, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Vermont, Kentucky, Tennessee and Washington, D.C. Several more jurisdictions are giving examinees the option to take the online October test, including Texas, Arizona and Oregon.
Delaware's plan to create a provision under which law graduates may practice under the supervision of a licensed attorney until they have a chance to sit for the bar exam hews more closely to an option unveiled Wednesday by the Hawaii Supreme Court. Hawaii still plans to give an in-person bar exam in September—unlike Delaware—but is giving candidates the option to work under the watch of an experienced attorney until July 2022, after which they must take a pass the bar exam.
Kelly Phillips Parker, executive director of the Board of Bar Examiners, was not available for comment Friday afternoon after the state announced the exam's cancellation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFed Judiciary Panel Mulls Authority to Ban In-State Bar Admission Requirements
The Importance of Contractual Language in Analyzing Post-Closing Earnout Disputes
6 minute readTopping Kirkland, Weil Won the Most Valuable Major Bankruptcy Retentions of 2024
After 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250