A federal appeals court on Thursday denied class certification to a group of indirect buyers of heavy-duty truck transmissions, but revived individual claims related to an alleged antitrust conspiracy between transmission supplier Eaton Corp. and four Class 8 truck manufacturers.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a lower court’s ruling that nixed the proposed class, saying the plaintiffs had not shown common evidence to support their claims that agreements between Eaton and the truck makers caused them to pay more for the transmissions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
