Filter This View

  • United States v. Gibbs

    Publication Date: 2024-05-20
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kristen Clarke, David Weiss, Briana Knox, Julie Pfluger, Caylee Campbell, U.S. Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE, Madison, WI, and Washington, DC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Clifton Gibbs, Philadelphia, PA, pro se defendant; Margaret M. Grasso, Law Office of Margaret M. Grasso, Philadelphia, PA, standby attorney for defendant.
    Case Number: 23-00035 (MN)

    Defendant failed to overcome the presumption of pretrial detention given the violent nature of his alleged offenses, his extensive criminal history, and his prior violations of the court's orders.

  • Stayathome v. Delaware Dep't of Corr

    Publication Date: 2024-05-20
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Webster Lloyd Stayathome, Plummer Community Corrections Center, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 23-1058 (MN)

    Plaintiff's civil rights claims against corrections officers dismissed for failure to allege sufficient facts to establish Eighth Amendment violations.

  • Nasir v. Liberto

    Publication Date: 2024-05-20
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Malik Nasir, Dover, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 23-1111-CFC

    Plaintiff could not bring Fourth Amendment claim against private business owner or recover damages arising from discovery of incriminating evidence and subsequent criminal prosecution.

  • Katz v. Beebe Healthcare

    Publication Date: 2024-05-13
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry: Health Care | Legal Services
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Bryson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 22-625-WCB

    Court imposed financial sanctions on plaintiff's former counsel due to counsel's failure to provide discovery despite repeated assurances of production.

  • Stanford v. Chimes of Delaware

    Publication Date: 2024-05-06
    Practice Area: Labor Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Trina M. Stanford, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 23-663-RGA

    Court sua sponte dismissed employment discrimination claims due to insufficient allegations regarding employment status and exhaustion of administrative remedies.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    New Jersey Estate Litigation 2014

    Authors: Michael R. Griffinger, Paul F. Cullum III

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • James v. Connolly

    Publication Date: 2024-05-06
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sharon M. James, Wilmington, DE, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 23-914-RGA

    Court sua sponte dismissed civil rights complaint upon screening where defendants were entitled to judicial immunity and plaintiff's allegations did not fall within the scope of a recognized Bivens claim.

  • Int'l Constr. Prod., LLC v. Caterpillar Inc.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-29
    Practice Area: Antitrust
    Industry: E-Commerce | Manufacturing
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew D. Stachel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, DE; William A. Isaacson, Amy J. Mauser, David E. Cole, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, D.C. for plaintiff.
    for defendant: David J. Baldwin, Peter C. McGivney, Berger Harris, Wilmington, DE; Joseph A. Ostoyich, Danielle Morello, Clifford Chance LLP, Washington, D.C.; Paul C. Cuomo, Heather Souder Choi, Adam Dec, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, D.C. for defendants.
    Case Number: 15-108-RGA

    Sherman Act violation claim failed under the rule of reason where plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to define the relevant geographic or product market, but removal of plaintiff's products from a website, which hampered its ability to compete, was sufficient evidence of refusal to deal.

  • United States v. Biden

    Publication Date: 2024-04-29
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Weiss, Special Counsel, Leo J. Wise, Principal Senior Assistant Special Counsel, Derek E. Hines, Senior Assistant Special Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Bartholomew J. Dalton, Dalton & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Abbe David Lowell, Christopher D. Man, Winston & Strawn, Washington, DC for defendant.
    Case Number: 23-61 (MN)

    Court declined to dismiss charges based on immunity purportedly conferred by a diversion agreement since the agreement lacked the approval necessary for it to go into effect and the parties and court disputed the scope of immunity.

  • Lewis v. Bezos

    Publication Date: 2024-04-29
    Practice Area: Damages
    Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert Charles Lewis, Salem, NJ, pro se plaintiff.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 23-785-CFC

    Court dismissed purported complaint for royalties due to insufficient allegations regarding any agreement for royalty payments or sales that would trigger a royalty obligation.

  • In re: Walmart Inc. Sec. Litig.

    Publication Date: 2024-04-22
    Practice Area: Securities Litigation
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sara Fuks, The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., New York, NY for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Robert W. Whetzel, Raymond J. DiCamillo, John M. O'Toole, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Sean M. Berkowitz, Nicholas J. Siciliano, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
    Case Number: 21-55-CFC

    Stockholders failed to adequately plead that securities filings were materially false or misleading where statements adequately conveyed that the company was subject to investigations and securities laws did not require corporations to guess as to the likely outcome of such investigations.