Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
799 results for '* court:"DELAWARE SUPREME COURT"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2024-08-13
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice LeGrow
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen J. Neuberger, Thomas S. Neuberger, The Neuberger Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Thomas C. Crumplar, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE for appellants.
for defendant: Zi-Xiang Shen, Zachary S. Stirparo, State of Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: 354, 2023
Suit challenging the constitutionality of COVID-19 restrictions on houses of worship filed months after such restrictions were lifted was not a justiciable controversy, and state officials were immune from damages for any constitutional violations where they exercised their discretion to impose the conditions in a good faith effort to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Publication Date: 2024-08-06
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Real Estate | Retail
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice LeGrow
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David A. Jenkins, Jason Z. Miller, Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP, Wilmington, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Douglas D. Herrmann, James H.S. Levine, Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew W. Zepeda, Lurie, Zepeda, Schmalz, Hogan & Martin, Los Angeles, CA for appellee.
Case Number: 318, 2023
Special limited partner was not entitled to distribution from sale of partnership's primary asset where partnership was entitled to deduct defeasance costs to satisfy the mortgage to sell the property as a "loan interest cost."
Publication Date: 2024-07-23
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Seitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John M. Seaman, Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Teresa Goody Guillén, Richard Raile, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Washington, DC; Marco Molina, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Costa Mesa, CA; Alexandra L. Trujillo, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Houston, TX for appellant.
for defendant: William R. Denny, Matthew F. Davis, Nicholas D. Mozal, Caneel Radinson-Blasucci, Eric J. Nascone, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Stefan Atkinson, Mary T. Reale, Mason E. Reynolds, Joseph Taglienti, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, New York, NY; Michael F. Williams, Don Hong, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington DC for appellees.
Case Number: 3, 2024
Court refused to enforce facially valid amended bylaws where board adopted them primarily to thwart stockholders' efforts to nominate opposing candidates to board.
Publication Date: 2024-07-16
Practice Area: Election and Political Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Alexander S. Mackler, Patricia A. Davis, Kenneth Wan, Delaware Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE; Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., Ginger D. Anders, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC for appellants.
for defendant: M. Jane Brady, Brady Legal Group LLC, Lewes, DE; Noel H. Johnson, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Alexandria, VA for appellees.
Case Number: 120, 2024
Plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge voting procedures where one was not a candidate in the upcoming election cycle and the other's role as inspector of elections did not implicate the challenged procedures.
Publication Date: 2024-07-09
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Walt F. Schmittinger, Schmittinger and Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Andrea C. Panico, Megan E. Murray, Tybout, Redfearn & Pell, Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: 412, 2023
COVID-19 was not an occupational disease where the risk of getting sick was not a peculiar risk of the worker's employment or work environment but rather was a general risk faced by all workers.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2024-07-02
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Non-Profit
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William D. Fletcher, Jr., Dianna E. Stuart, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Kevin J. Connors, Marshall Dennehey, P.C., Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: 249, 2023
Dog bite statute contained no language indicating the legislature's intent to exclude animal welfare organizations from the definition of an "owner."
Publication Date: 2024-06-25
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Energy | Insurance
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Baldwin, Peter McGivney, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brent W. Vincent, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Chicago, IL for appellants.
for defendant: Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bove, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Louis A. Bové, Bodell Bove, LLC, Philadelphia, PA for appellee.
Case Number: N19C-05-275
Trial court correctly determined that insurance policy unambiguously excluded coverage for wrongful acts that occurred after the coverage period, as the policy's run-off exclusion merely allowed claimant to file a covered claim after the policy period expired.
Publication Date: 2024-06-11
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Consulting | Energy
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven T. Margolin, Lisa M. Zwally, Samuel L. Moultrie, Bryan T. Reed, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Hal S. Shaftel, Daniel Friedman, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY for appellants.
for defendant: John L. Reed, Peter H. Kyle, Daniel P. Klusman, DLA Piper LLP, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin D. Schuman, DLA Piper LLP, Baltimore, MD for appellee.
Case Number: N15C-08-109
Trial court erred in categorically excluding prejudgment interest from the post-judgment interest calculation where prejudgment interest was a component of the judgment.
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys: For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Michael A. Barlow, Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; R. Brian Timmons, David M. Grable, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; David Cooper, Deborah K. Brown, Nathan Goralnik, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY for appellants.
for defendant: Bradley R. Aronstam, S. Michael Sirkin, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Ditchfield, Brian M. Burnovski, Pascale Bibi, Kyra Macy Kaufman, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY; Neal Kumar Katyal, Nathaniel A.G. Zelinsky, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., Dennis H. Tracey, III, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY for appellees.
Case Number: 2022-0808
Court remanded for reconsideration of interpretation of contractual requirement using extrinsic evidence where both parties proffered reasonable interpretations of the provision.
Publication Date: 2024-05-13
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: E-Commerce | Health Care | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ned Weinberger, Brendan W. Sullivan, Labaton Sucharow LLP, Wilmington, DE; John Vielandi, Labaton Sucharow LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy Friedman, David Tejtel, Friedman Oster & Tejtel PLLC, Bedford Hills, NY; Lee D. Rudy, Eric L. Zagar, J. Daniel Albert, Geoffrey C. Jarvis, Grant D. Goodhart, III, Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP, Radnor, PA for appellants.
for defendant: Raymond J. DiCamillo, Kevin M. Gallagher, Craig K. Ferrere, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; William M. Lafferty, Ryan D. Stottmann, Alexandra M. Cumings, Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Blair Connelly, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Kristin N. Murphy, Ryan A. Walsh, Latham & Watkins LLP, Costa Mesa, CA for appellees.
Case Number: 2022-0698
Court reversed dismissal of action challenging corporate acquisition where proxy statement failed to disclose advisors' conflicts of interest and erroneously described the advisors' roles in the transaction.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read