Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
1,771 results for '* court:"Delaware Superior Court"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2022-12-27
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nicholas Bittner for appellant.
for defendant: David Crumplar for appellee.
Case Number: N22A-05-012 SKR
Industrial Accident Board had a sufficient evidentiary basis to award additional medical expenses upon crediting claimant's treating physician's testimony that was probative to show that epidural injections were causally related to claimant's work injury and necessary to provide him with functional relief.
Publication Date: 2022-12-20
Practice Area: Corporate Entities
Industry: Advertising | Software
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Wallace
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Garrett B. Moritz, Elizabeth M. Taylor, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Demian A. Ordway, Timothy W. Grinsell, Victoria Roeck, Holwell Shuster & Goldberg LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Seth A. Niederman, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gavin W. Skok, Fox Rothschild LLP, Seattle, WA for defendant.
Case Number: N22C-06-133
The court denied a motion to dismiss a claim in Delaware under the McWane Doctrine on the basis that a separate action between the parties in California raised different issues.
Publication Date: 2022-12-20
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: E-Commerce | Software
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Wilks, Wilks Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE; David Leichtman, Leichtman Law PLLC, New York, NY for plaintiff.
for defendant: Matthew E. Fischer, Jonathan A. Choa, Jacqueline A. Rogers, Carla M. Jones, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Vanessa Soriano Power, Stoel Rives LLP, Seattle, WA; Samantha K. Sondag, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR for defendants.
Case Number: N21C-05-198 EMD CCLD
Quasi-contractual claims failed where there was no evidence that plaintiffs performed any services or conferred any benefit on defendants beyond those expressly identified in the parties' written contract.
Publication Date: 2022-12-20
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Justice Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nicholas H. Rodriguez, Schmittinger & Rodriguez, P.A., Dover, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Krista E. Shevlin, Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby LLP, New Castle, DE for defendant.
Case Number: K22C-07-005 NEP
Uninsured motorist coverage did not apply in an accident caused by a horse-drawn buggy, since it was not a "motor vehicle" as it was not self-propelled by an internal combustion engine.
Publication Date: 2022-12-20
Practice Area: Motor Vehicle Torts
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Benjamin Schwartz, Schwartz & Schwartz, Dover, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Kenneth Doss, Casarino, Christman, Shalk, Ransom & Doss, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: N18C-09-142 SKR
Additur appropriate where jury verdict on retrial indicated that it did not find liability or causation even though such issues had been resolved in a prior judgment as a matter of law, so that the jury's zero-verdict could be brought up to a minimum reasonable amount of damages.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors: Daniel A. Cohen, Joshua Feinstein
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2022-12-20
Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Food and Beverage | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: William Fretz, pro se appellant
for defendant: Dover, DE. Michael G. Rushe, Hudson, Jones, Jaywork & Fisher, LLC, Dover, DE; Victoria E. Groff, Department of Justice, Wilmington, DE for appellees.
Case Number: K22A-05-003 NEP
The court remanded a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denying appellant's unemployment benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his position and therefore did not qualify for benefits under 19 Del. C. §3314(1).
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Valihura
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Mary F. Dugan, Lauren E.M. Russell, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert W. Capobianco, Adriana R. Midence, Kelli N. Church, Jackson Lewis P.C., Atlanta, GA for appellants.
for defendant: Bruce W. McCullough, Bodell Bove, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Salmeh K. Fodor, Kristoffer V. Sargent, KF Law, LLC, Atlanta, GA for appellees.
Case Number: 382, 2021
The court affirmed in part and reversed in part a cross-appeal arising out of a corporate litigation claim.
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Health Care | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Butler
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael W. McDermott, David B. Anthony, Berger Harris LLP, Wilmington, DE; Bryan J. Wick, Jack Lilley, Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, Dallas TX for plaintiff.
for defendant: Blake Rohrbacher, Samuel J. Gray, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Matthew Messerli, The Messerli Law Firm, Trophy Club, TX for defendant.
Case Number: N21C-12-131 CEB
Suit for wages and severance pay was not dismissed where employer identified no condition precedent to terminated employee's right to receive wages, and where there were outstanding issues of material fact concerning whether employer had materially breached the parties' contract, entitling employee to receive separation pay.
Publication Date: 2022-12-13
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 1712008053
Motion for postconviction relief failed where defendant could not show that newly discovered eyewitness with testimony supporting a claim of self-defense would have altered the outcome of the trial as such testimony did not establish defendant's actual innocence, particularly where the testimony could not explain why defendant continued to use force and robbed the victim.
Publication Date: 2022-12-06
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: Health Care
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Primos
Attorneys: For plaintiff: M. Denise Tolliver, Camden, DE, pro se plaintiff.
for defendant: Tiffany R. Hubbard, Pamela Moore, McCarter & English, LLP, Hartford, CT; Chelsea A. Botsch, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware for defendants.
Case Number: K21C-06-040 NEP
The court found for defendant corporation in an employment litigation sounding in discrimination and defamation claims.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read