Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
265 results for '* industry:"State and Local Government"' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2023-12-04
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Winston
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Raykia Faucett, pro se appellant.
for defendant: Matthew B. Frawley, Delaware Department of Justice for appellee.
Case Number: N23A-06-010 PAW
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board did not abuse its discretion in declining appeal and finding appeal from disqualification decision untimely where there was no evidence to rebut the presumption of receipt of the decision letter.
Publication Date: 2023-11-06
Practice Area: Consumer Protection
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Karsnitz
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Paradee, Brian V. DeMott, Dover, DE for petitioner.
for defendant: Owen P. Lefkon, Ryan T. Costa, Deputy Attorneys General, State of Delaware Department of Justice Wilmington, DE for respondent.
Case Number: S23M-06-018-CAK
Consumer Protection Unit had statutory authority to issue subpoenas to affiliate of manufactured home community owners where it was not exclusively bound to make civil investigative demands under the Consumer Fraud Act, and the subpoenas were sufficiently tailored to the scope of an investigation into the safety of the community residents.
Publication Date: 2023-10-30
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Energy | Non-Profit | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Medinilla
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard L. Abbot, Abbot Law Firm, Hockessin, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Max B. Walton, Lisa R. Hatfield, Erica K. Sefton, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Newark, DE; Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stabler, James D. Taylor, Jr., Saul Ewing LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-03-196 VLM
Although plaintiffs failed to seek timely certiorari review of conditional use permit approval, transfer of the case from the chancery court after it concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because plaintiffs had an adequate remedy at law permitted the court to exercise its discretion to hear the case.
Publication Date: 2023-10-30
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry: Construction | Real Estate | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Butler
Attorneys: For plaintiff: John W. Paradee, Brian V. DeMott, Baird Mandalas Brockstedt & Federico, LLC, Dover, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Scott G. Wilcox, Giordano, DelCollo, Werb & Gagne, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: N23C-03-181 CEB
The court found that the complaint for certiorari regarding the denial of a conditional use permit was not untimely filed, the claim was not barred by plaintiff's failure to exhaust its administrative remedies, and the mayor and members of the town council were immune from suit in their individual capacity.
Publication Date: 2023-10-09
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kate Butler, Kate Butler Law LLC, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Scott G. Wilcox, Moore and Rutt, P.A., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: N22M-02-006 EMD
Concluding that plaintiff did not have a present right to join the state pension plan, the court ruled that it could not issue a writ of mandamus. Moreover, the petition for a writ of mandamus to allow plaintiff to participate in the state pension plan was barred by the three-year statute of limitations as no claim as to a present right to mandamus was presented.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Authors:
View this BookView more book results for the query "*"
Publication Date: 2023-10-09
Practice Area: Government
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Burke
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James G. McMillan, III, William E. Green, Jr., Halloran Farkas + Kittila LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark C. Rifkin, Benjamin Y. Kaufman, Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, NY; Arthur Susman, Law Office of Arthur Susman, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
for defendant: Arthur G. Connolly, Max B. Walton, Christina M. Thompson, Lisa R. Hatfield, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: 22-611-CJB
Concluding that a litigant does not have a cognizable property interest in abandoned property, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint challenging the constitutionality of Delaware's Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Law. In addition, the court dismissed the complaint on ripeness grounds concluding that because the questions of whether plaintiff would actually make a claim on the property and be able to sufficiently demonstrate his ownership rights were unanswered, the parties' interests were not sufficiently adverse to give rise to
Publication Date: 2023-10-09
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry: Construction | Federal Government | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge McKee
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lisa A. Mathewson, Philadelphia, PA for appellants.
for defendant: Paul G. Shapiro, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA; David E. Troyer, Office of United States Attorney, Philadelphia, PA for appellee.
Case Number: 19-3679
District court erred in setting the loss calculation at defendants' total profits where defendants lawfully performed work on the public construction project, with the DOT/PennDOT merely expecting defendants to obtain certain construction materials from a qualifying supplier.
Publication Date: 2023-10-02
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert C. McDonald, Adrienne M. McDonald, Silverman McDonald & Friedman, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
for defendant: Robert M. Goff, Jr., City of Wilmington Law Department, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case Number: 2019-0969-KSJM
Chancery court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction over former police officer's complaint challenging his termination for failure to comply with later-voided revised residency requirement, where declaratory judgment or certiorari review would be unlikely to afford relief given city's continued assertion, despite the striking down of the revised policy, that officer's termination was proper.
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Non-Profit | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Adams
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stephen J. Neuberger, Thomas S. Neuberger, The Neuberger Firm, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Thomas C. Crumplar, Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Scott D. Cousins, Cousins Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; Martin D. Haverly, Martin D. Haverly, Attorney at Law, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
for defendant: Andrew D. Cordo, Daniyal M. Iqbal, Nora M. Crawford, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case Number: N23C-01-123 MAA
Plaintiffs' lawsuit challenging past COVID-19-related restrictions on houses of worship was dismissed where governor was entitled to qualified immunity as it was unclear at the time the restrictions were implemented that such restrictions were unconstitutional and where the lawsuit was not justiciable since there was no longer an active case or controversy.
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Construction | Legal Services | State and Local Government
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice LeGrow
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Max B. Walton, Shaun Michael Kelly, Erica K. Sefton, Connolly Gallagher LLP, Newark, DE for appellant.
for defendant: Paul A. Logan, Post & Schell, P.C., Wilmington, DE for appellee.
Case Number: N21C-12-039
Although declaratory judgment action did not breach the parties' settlement, the fact that the action was related to litigation nonetheless triggered defendants' indemnification obligations under the settlement to reimburse plaintiff for its legal costs incurred in the action.
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
1 minute read