Drop Shipped Goods Failed to Qualify for Administrative Expense Priority in Bankruptcy
In order for a creditor who supplies goods to a debtor within 20 days before the bankruptcy petition is filed to recover the value of the goods as a priority administrative expense under Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor must have had physical possession of the goods and not merely constructive receipt.
August 09, 2017 at 09:02 AM
6 minute read
In In re SRC Liquidation, Case No. 15-10541 (BLS) (Del. Bankr. July 13), U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Shannon of the District of Delaware held that in order for a creditor who supplies goods to a debtor within 20 days before the bankruptcy petition is filed to recover the value of the goods as a priority administrative expense under Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor must have had physical possession of the goods and not merely constructive receipt. Accordingly, where goods were delivered directly to the debtor's customers, even though at the debtor's direction and utilizing the debtor's account with the shipper, the goods will not qualify for administrative priority treatment. The decision has significance for a creditor that sells goods to a debtor soon before the debtor files a bankruptcy petition.
Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code accords administrative expense priority to a claim equal to the value of any goods sold to the debtor in the ordinary course of the debtor's business and received by the debtor within 20 days before the petition date. Administrative expense claims are exceptions to the general equality principle in bankruptcy and are strictly construed.
The facts in the case were not in dispute. IIMAK was a vendor to the debtor and its products were at times delivered directly to the debtor. These were “directly delivered goods.” At other times, its products were delivered to the debtor's customers at the debtor's direction and utilizing the debtor's account with United Parcel Service. These were “drop shipped goods.” IIMAK argued that the claim for the value of the drop shipped goods delivered to the debtor's customers in the 20-day period prior to the petition date should be treated as administrative expenses. The issue was whether the shipment of goods during the relevant 20-day period to the debtor's customers constituted receipt by the debtor for purposes of satisfying the “received by the debtor” requirement under Section 503(b)(9).
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCourt of Chancery Rejects 'Caremark' Liability for Imperfect Compliance With Legal Obligations
5 minute readEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is Still a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 4Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250