Viral Photo of Staff Flipping Off Newborn Exposes Hospital to Tort Liability
An in-house lawyer was among three executives sent to federal prison in a Medicare fraud scheme involving doctored electronic health care records. The others included the CEO and a former owner of the company.
September 27, 2017 at 01:01 PM
3 minute read
In recent years companies, including hospitals, have found a powerful tool in social media. But some have also experienced the legal consequences when something goes wrong. Naval Hospital Jacksonville in Florida, where viral images of newborn babies being mishandled by staff recently originated, may be the latest example.
Such inappropriate conduct, hastened by the prolific use of smartphones and ease of data sharing, can expose hospitals to a number of legal causes of action, experts say. But the risks can be mitigated, they added, by planning ahead and training employees.
Last week, a photo—shared 185,000 times on Facebook—showed a hospital staff member raising a middle finger to a baby. “How I currently feel about these mini Satans,” read the photo's caption. In an online video, another staff member is seen moving a baby to make it look like the child is dancing to rap music.
“We are aware of a video/photo posted online,” the hospital said in a statement. “It's outrageous, unacceptable, incredibly unprofessional and cannot be tolerated. We have identified the staff members involved. They have been removed from patient care and they will be handled by the legal system and military justice.”
Such actions by employees could result, most commonly, in invasion of privacy or intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuits against the hospitals, said Kristin Michaels, a labor and employment litigation partner at McDermott Will & Emery. In the Jacksonville hospital case, a battery claim could also be brought if the child were handled in a potentially harmful way, she added.
A California anesthesiologist's decision in 2011 to decorate an unconscious patient's face with stickers, a cellphone photo of which was taken by a nurse's aide and spread online, prompted a lawsuit against the hospital and doctor for alleged breach of medical privacy. The plaintiff dismissed the suit in 2014, according to an online docket report of the case.
To help prevent such instances, all health care providers should have a policy that spells out the appropriate use of social media in the workplace, making clear, among other things, that patient privacy and confidentiality must be maintained and that social media cannot be used to harass either patients or employees, Michaels said.
While the company's general counsel should have a hand in developing such a policy, other departments, including human resources, compliance, risk management and information technology, should also be involved, said Jo-Ellyn Sakowitz Klein, senior counsel who focuses on privacy and data security matters at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
Klein said that policies should be developed after a risk assessment that considers not just the legal but the business and public relations risks associated with that particular type of facility's social media use, adding that the analysis should also include consideration of social media-related problems the company has already experienced. There is no “one-size-fits-all” social media policy in the health care space, she said.
“It's really important for everyone to remember that social norms of decency must continue to apply in the online context, as applicable laws certainly do,” Klein said.
Having a policy in place is not enough, though, Michaels said. Companies are well-advised to redistribute the policy and have employees acknowledge receipt on an annual basis, she added.
Contact Kristen Rasmussen at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'I Don't Want to Die Fearfully': Outsiders Can't Get Help to Die in NJ
4 minute readQui Tam Suits and Veil Piercing: A Powerful Combo for Combating Heath Care Fraud
9 minute readShareholder Claims Pharma Co. Exaggerated Success of Experimental Cancer Treatment
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. High Court: Concrete Proof Not Needed to Weigh Grounds for Preliminary Injunction Order
- 2'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 3Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 4Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
- 5Davis Wright Tremaine Turns to Gen AI To Teach Its Associates Legal Writing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250