Hedge Fund Sues Bootmaker Over Board Election
Marcato Capital Management on Monday sued the manufacturer of UGG boots, Deckers Outdoor Corp., in the Delaware Court of Chancery in a bid to force a vote on the hedge fund's board nominees and avoid more than $120 million in financial penalties against the company.
October 24, 2017 at 06:02 PM
3 minute read
Marcato Capital Management on Monday sued the manufacturer of UGG boots, Deckers Outdoor Corp., in the Delaware Court of Chancery in a bid to force a vote on the hedge fund's board nominees and avoid more than $120 million in financial penalties against the company.
The lawsuit was the latest escalation in a proxy fight launched last month by Marcato's Mick McGuire, who has been pressuring the company into a sale. Marcato, which holds an 8.4 percent stake in Deckers, has proposed its own slate of 10 directors to replace Deckers' entire board and seize control of the company.
In a 32-page complaint, Marcato said Deckers has refused to approve its nominees, arguing it would trigger a change-of-control provision that would force $103 million in debt to come due under a credit agreement and trigger $19 million in equity awards and payments to Deckers' executives.
The hedge fund asked the court to enforce the Dec. 14 date for the planned stockholder meeting and to designate its nominees as “continuing directors” in order to disable the provision in the agreement.
“Quite simply, the board has no good faith basis to believe that the Marcato nominees pose a danger to the interests of the company or the stockholders, and therefore must approve and nominate the Marcato nominees in accordance with their fiduciary duties,” Marcato said. “The board's refusal to approve and nominate the Marcato nominees serves no corporate interest and has no purpose other than to maintain the director defendants in office.”
Deckers has said that Marcato's request was not in “the best interests of the company and its stockholders,” and that it lacks the ability to alter the terms of the credit agreement before the election of a dissident slate of directors. On Tuesday, the company said it would vigorously defend the action.
“Our annual meeting of stockholders is already scheduled for Dec. 14, 2017,” Deckers said in a statement. “Marcato's lawsuit is unnecessary, a distraction from our successful transformation, and a self-serving attempt to advance its own interests at the expense of all other stockholders.”
Marcato said that the Dec. 14 meeting date is likely a violation of Delaware law, which requires, in most instances, that companies hold the annual gatherings within 13 months of each other. The upcoming meeting is scheduled 15 months after the stockholders last met in September 2016.
Marcato said Deckers has not yet confirmed the date of the annual meeting amid concerns from the board that a proxy contest would hamper the company's busy winter shopping season. But Marcato said Deckers had “manufactured” the crisis by delaying the meeting until mid-December, and it feared that Deckers would just try to postpone the meeting again.
“The board's refusal to confirm the annual meeting date bolsters Marcato's concern that the director defendants may seek to hold on to their seats by delaying their day of reckoning at the ballot box. The court should not permit the company to stall corporate democracy any longer,” Marcato said.
Marcato is represented by a team of attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, which recently advised the hedge fund on its successful proxy context against Buffalo Wild Wings Inc., which won Marcato three out of four seats on that company's board.
The Delaware case is captioned Marcato International v. Gibbons.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Navigating AI Risks: Best Practices for Compliance and Security
- 220 New Judges? Connecticut Could Get Wave of Jurists
- 3Orrick Loses 10-Lawyer Team to Herbert Smith in Germany
- 4‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Legal Arm of the Big Four Firm Entering the US
- 5Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250