Coons' Bill Adds 2 Temporary Judges to Busy Del. Bankruptcy Court
The U.S. Senate this week approved legislation to provide five years of reinforcement for Delaware's bankruptcy court, one of the busiest in the nation.
October 26, 2017 at 03:25 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Chris Coons.
The U.S. Senate this week approved legislation to provide five years of reinforcement for Delaware's bankruptcy court, one of the busiest in the nation.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Chris Coons, extends Delaware's five existing temporary bankruptcy judgeships and creates two new ones on the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, which has just one permanent judge in Wilmington. Both the existing posts and the new ones are set to expire after five years.
The measure was included with a $36.5 billion disaster-relief bill, which passed the Senate Tuesday on a 82-17 vote and now heads to the desk of President Donald Trump, who was expected to sign it within 10 days.
“I am pleased this bipartisan law will give our bankruptcy courts the judges they need to manage pressing caseloads,” Coons said Tuesday in a statement. “Delaware has rightly earned its reputation for having one of the most highly regarded bankruptcy courts in the country, and this law ensures that our court has the additional judgeships it needs to administer justice.”
The bankruptcy court has been operating with the assistance of five temporary judges since 2005, when Congress created 27 temporary judgeships amid a national rise in bankruptcy filings. The positions were renewed for five more years in 2012, but expired in May, setting up what the Judicial Conference of the United States warned could be a “debilitating workload crisis” if they were not made permanent.
Should any of the temporary judges have retired or been unable to serve after the May 25 expiration date, the position would have been lost altogether.
In a letter to Congress, the Judicial Conference, which frames policy guidelines for the federal courts, urged lawmakers in April to convert 14 of the temporary judgeships, including all five in Delaware, to permanent status.
“The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, for example, would be crippled as five of their six authorized judgeships are temporary, all with the risk of expiring in 2017,” the Judicial Conference said.
In May, Coons introduced legislation calling for the conversion of all 14 temporary judgeships to permanent positions. The measure passed the Senate by unanimous consent in September but was never taken up in the U.S. House of Representatives, according to congressional records. Instead, a revised measure later emerged in a compromise and was included with a House bill authorizing federal funds to assist the victims of a recent string of hurricanes and wildfires.
Under the new bill, the temporary judgeships were extended and new short-term positions were added for Delaware, Michigan and the Middle District of Florida. However, no new permanent judgeships were added.
Jeremy W. Ryan, chair of the Delaware State Bar Association's bankruptcy law section, praised the bill, saying the new temporary judgeships would “ease the burden” of Delaware's six current judges. But he also acknowledged the need to eventually create more permanent positions on the bench.
“A permanent solution would always be much preferred, but this is certainly a step in the right direction,” said Ryan, a partner with Potter Anderson & Corroon.
A spokesman for Coons said that he did not plan to move another bill in the near term, but the senator would be monitoring the Administrative Office of the Courts moving forward.
Delaware, like most jurisdictions across the country, has seen an overall decline in bankruptcy filings since the financial crisis caused filings to peak in 2009. In 2016, new filings in Delaware fell to 2,951, down 36 percent from a high of 4,630 seven years prior, according to statistics from the Judicial Conference.
However, Delaware's docket still has a high number of Chapter 11 cases, which tend to be more complex than other bankruptcy filings, and “mega” cases—filings involving at least $100 million or 1,000 creditors or more—have also been on the rise, causing some to express concern for the long-term stability of the court.
“We would certainly hope at some point we could make these all permanent,” Ryan said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250