Strine Seeks to Bolster Bench Strength of Chancery Court
Delaware Supreme Court Justice Leo E. Strine Jr. has asked the state's lawmakers to create seats for two new vice chancellors on the Delaware Court of Chancery as part of his fiscal year 2019 budget request.
November 02, 2017 at 06:50 PM
3 minute read
Delaware State Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr.
Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine Jr. has asked the state's lawmakers to create seats for two new vice chancellors on the Delaware Court of Chancery as part of his fiscal year 2019 budget request.
On Wednesday, Strine told members of Delaware's Office of Management and Budget in Dover that a growing docket of complex corporate cases supported the proposed expansion of the court's current five-member bench to seven.
The Court of Chancery, which hears disputes from more than 1 million corporations and alternative entities formed under Delaware law, has long been seen as an economic driver for the state, but Strine said the court risked falling behind unless lawmakers freed up funding for two new judgeships and eight additional staffers.
According to Strine, who served on the Chancery Court from 1998 to 2014, new filings in the court of equity have increased 64 percent in the past decade, and judges are being asked to review thicker filings and address more time-sensitive motions to expedite cases.
“My friends on Chancery are busting their humps and doing a great job. But too much is being asked of them,” Strine said, according to prepared text provided by the courts. “Giving them two more judges will provide relief, and most importantly, will give them the extra time to think and write—time is essential to doing work at the high level demanded of them.”
The proposal, which would have to be enacted through legislation, would cost almost $1.2 million per year, with nearly $700,000 coming from the state's General Fund and the rest coming from fines and fees used to pay for operating costs, a representative from the Delaware Administrative Office of the Courts said.
However, Strine's request comes as the chief justice is renewing his unanswered calls from past years for increased appropriations to fund employee pay fairness initiatives and upgrades to the courts' facilities and technology.
The top priority, he said, was securing a $1,700 annual supplement for the nearly 50 percent of judicial branch employees who have to pay to park in Wilmington. For the majority of those workers earning an annual salary of less than $32,000, the cost of parking amounts to five percent of their total income, Strine said.
He also asked for lawmakers to convert 12 security positions from casual or seasonal designations to full-time status and the creation of a stable technology fund for the courts.
All of those proposals were included in the judiciary's past two budget requests, but none have been funded through the state's annual appropriations process. On Wednesday, Strine again painted the issues as a matter of fundamental fairness and credibility for the state.
“We encourage private sector employers to be responsible and give their full-time workers access to affordable, high quality health care. The state should set an example and live up to its own stated policy, by doing so itself,” he said in the prepared remarks.
Strine is also asking for an additional $13.7 million in capital funds to cover design fees and to hire a construction manager for two new Family Court facilities in Georgetown and Dover, which have long been decried for the operational and security concerns they pose.
Strine is expected to make another formal funding request to the General Assembly's Joint Finance Committee, after lawmakers return to session this January.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250