Third Circuit Denies Expedited Appeal in Bid to Stop TransPerfect Sale
A federal appeals court is unlikely to rule on Philip R. Shawe's constitutional challenge to the forced sale of TransPerfect Global Inc., the firm's co-founder acknowledged on Tuesday, after briefing was scheduled to wrap up next month.
November 07, 2017 at 05:21 PM
3 minute read
Philip Shawe.
A federal appeals court is unlikely to rule on Philip R. Shawe's constitutional challenge to the forced sale of TransPerfect Global Inc., the firm's co-founder acknowledged on Tuesday, after briefing was scheduled to wrap up next month.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Monday denied Shawe's request to expedite his appeal, as the Delaware Court of Chancery-ordered sale speeds toward completion. According to the two-page order from Judge Cheryl Ann Krause of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, all briefing is set to conclude Dec. 15.
Shawe had asked the Third Circuit to fast track briefing in the case, which argues that Chancery Court Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard's 2015 decision to appoint a custodian to oversee a modified auction of the deadlocked company amounted to an unconstitutional taking of his private property. A Delaware federal judge dismissed the case in September.
Shawe has argued that without expedited treatment, there may be no way to avoid the sale of the company he had helped to found in 1992. On Tuesday, he said that his options were running out, though he vowed to “never stop fighting” to reverse what he called an illegal and “premeditated scheme to unjustly enrich a select few.”
“Unfortunately, if I do not win the auction, we may see a scrambled egg problem—that is, consummation of the sale before appeals are exhausted will irretrievably and irreparably change the company,” he said in a statement.
An attorney for Robert B. Pincus, the court-appointed custodian, declined to comment on Tuesday.
Final bids for the profitable translation-services company are due on Wednesday, and a final sale order is expected to be entered by the end of the year, according to court documents.
Shawe is competing to buy the firm, but the campaign is seen as a long shot after years of bruising litigation with co-founder and CEO Elizabeth Elting and, now, competition from potential private equity buyers who were said to have entered the fray.
Elting, who first petitioned for TransPerfect's dissolution in 2014, has not opposed the sale.
Juda Engelmayer, a spokesman for Shawe, said that if Shawe does not prevail, he would move to enjoin the sale, based on other pending lawsuits and his appeal to the Third Circuit. However, those prospects seemed dim.
“If Pincus and Liz [Elting] have their way, these all will be academic decisions going forward,” Engelmayer said in an email.
The winning bidder will be required to enter a final sale agreement to acquire all of TransPerfect's stock, which is currently held by Elting, Shawe and Shawe's mother, Shirley Shawe. Bouchard would have to approve the agreement, and any objecting parties would then have the option for an expedited appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, which upheld the planned sale in February.
Shawe's attorneys said in court filings that they expect the sale to close by late January, though it could stretch into March or April of next year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250