Argument Scrapped in Lawsuit Over Prison Riot Death
A Delaware federal judge on Friday postponed a key hearing on motions to dismiss a lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, after an attorney for two former governors said the parties were actively pursuing talks in the case.
November 17, 2017 at 12:55 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Delaware federal judge on Friday postponed a key hearing on motions to dismiss a lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, after an attorney for two former governors said the parties were actively pursuing talks in the case.
The decision to scrap oral argument, originally scheduled for Nov. 20, came just hours after Richards, Layton & Finger director C. Malcolm Cochran IV wrote to U.S. District Judge Richard G. Andrews of the District of Delaware on Thursday afternoon asking for the delay. Though the letter was filed by a member of the state's legal team, Cochran said both sides were united in making the request.
“Among other issues, the parties are discussing an amendment to the complaint,” Cochran said in the one-page letter. “We wish to proceed efficiently before the court, and so are jointly requesting a postponement of Monday's argument on the pending motions to dismiss.”
The parties plan to report back to Andrews by Dec. 15 on “any issues” that they would need to present to the court, Cochran wrote.
Andrews' oral order granting the delay did not contain a written explanation, and it was not clear Friday morning when or if the hearing would take place.
Cochran, who is representing former Delaware Govs. Ruth Ann Minner and Jack Markell, did not return a call seeking comment on the issues being discussed, and Thomas S. Neuberger, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he was “not at liberty to make any comment.”
Neuberger is representing the family of Lt. Steven Floyd Sr., a veteran correction officer who was killed in the nearly 18-hour takeover earlier this year, as well as five Delaware Department of Correction employees who survived the attack. His clients have accused current and former state officials of failing to address critical security concerns that led to the siege.
Specifically, the suit alleges that Minner and Markell hid chronic understaffing from lawmakers and the public and that Markell had enacted policies as governor that left corrections guards outmanned and overworked. Markell's eight years in office ended in January, and Minner has not served in the post since 2009.
State officials moved to dismiss the suit in June, claiming qualified and legislative immunity. Among other things, they argued that the state was under no constitutional obligation to ensure safe working conditions at the Smyrna prison.
Based on court filings, oral argument next week was expected to focus at least in part on the issue of standing.
Neuberger and his team have pointed to a 2005 ruling from former U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. denying a motion to dismiss the case of a counselor who was raped in the same prison as reason for the suit to continue. Attorneys for the state, on the other hand, have said that a pair of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have heightened federal pleading standards since Farnan ruled in favor of the counselor, Cassandra Arnold.
Arnold later settled her case against the state for $1.6 million.
The current suit, captioned Floyd v. Minner, also names three former DOC commissioners, current Commissioner Perry Phelps and three directors of the Office of Management and Budget as defendants.
The sides have agreed to stay discovery in the case, pending a ruling on the motions to dismiss. However, third-party discovery, relating only to damages, has been allowed to proceed.
A Delaware federal judge on Friday postponed a key hearing on motions to dismiss a lawsuit by the survivors of the deadly Feb. 1 takeover of James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, after an attorney for two former governors said the parties were actively pursuing talks in the case.
The decision to scrap oral argument, originally scheduled for Nov. 20, came just hours after
“Among other issues, the parties are discussing an amendment to the complaint,” Cochran said in the one-page letter. “We wish to proceed efficiently before the court, and so are jointly requesting a postponement of Monday's argument on the pending motions to dismiss.”
The parties plan to report back to Andrews by Dec. 15 on “any issues” that they would need to present to the court, Cochran wrote.
Andrews' oral order granting the delay did not contain a written explanation, and it was not clear Friday morning when or if the hearing would take place.
Cochran, who is representing former Delaware Govs. Ruth Ann Minner and Jack Markell, did not return a call seeking comment on the issues being discussed, and Thomas S. Neuberger, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said he was “not at liberty to make any comment.”
Neuberger is representing the family of Lt. Steven Floyd Sr., a veteran correction officer who was killed in the nearly 18-hour takeover earlier this year, as well as five Delaware Department of Correction employees who survived the attack. His clients have accused current and former state officials of failing to address critical security concerns that led to the siege.
Specifically, the suit alleges that Minner and Markell hid chronic understaffing from lawmakers and the public and that Markell had enacted policies as governor that left corrections guards outmanned and overworked. Markell's eight years in office ended in January, and Minner has not served in the post since 2009.
State officials moved to dismiss the suit in June, claiming qualified and legislative immunity. Among other things, they argued that the state was under no constitutional obligation to ensure safe working conditions at the Smyrna prison.
Based on court filings, oral argument next week was expected to focus at least in part on the issue of standing.
Neuberger and his team have pointed to a 2005 ruling from former U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan Jr. denying a motion to dismiss the case of a counselor who was raped in the same prison as reason for the suit to continue. Attorneys for the state, on the other hand, have said that a pair of recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions have heightened federal pleading standards since Farnan ruled in favor of the counselor, Cassandra Arnold.
Arnold later settled her case against the state for $1.6 million.
The current suit, captioned Floyd v. Minner, also names three former DOC commissioners, current Commissioner Perry Phelps and three directors of the Office of Management and Budget as defendants.
The sides have agreed to stay discovery in the case, pending a ruling on the motions to dismiss. However, third-party discovery, relating only to damages, has been allowed to proceed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
- 1How Legal Aid and Tech Collaboration Can Bridge the Justice Gap
- 2The Rise of AI-Generated Deepfakes: A New Cybersecurity Threat for Law Firms
- 3Litigation Leaders: Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Evaluation In-House
- 4Spoliation Sanctions
- 5At FDA, Flavored Vape Products Go Up In Smoke
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250