Snow Forces Courts to Close Their Doors, but Not Their Dockets
The work of Delaware's federal court continued throughout the day on Thursday, after a strong winter storm closed the courthouse doors in Wilmington.
January 04, 2018 at 04:18 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
The work of Delaware's federal court continued throughout the day on Thursday, after a strong winter storm closed the courthouse doors in Wilmington.
U.S. Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware announced Thursday morning that the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware was closed due to inclement weather, which was expected to drop four to eight inches of snow in the area, according to weather reports.
The decision was made largely out of concern for the safety of the public and court employees, who would have had to traverse snow-packed streets, slippery sidewalks and bitter winds in order to reach the building at 844 N. King St.
However, for one of the country's busiest district courts, taking the day off was not an option.
Judges and other high-ranking court personnel were able to work throughout the day, either remotely or by braving the blustery conditions to reach their offices. Attorneys, meanwhile, used the court's e-filing system to submit documents, albeit at lower volumes than in the previous days.
Still, hearings scheduled to take place in Wilmington were scrapped for the day, leading judges to adjust their calendars or conduct teleconferences instead.
Stark did not respond to multiple requests for comment, but the district court was expected to reopen Friday morning.
Things were quieter on Thursday for Delaware's state courts, which follow executive-level directives for closing due to bad weather.
The Delaware Court of Chancery, which has courthouses in all three counties, shuttered almost all of its operations after Gov. John Carney ordered government offices closed statewide, said Karlis Johnson, court administrator.
Fortunately, Johnson said, the court had a light schedule after the holidays, with no trials scheduled for this week. Teleconferences and oral arguments that had been slated for Thursday would be rearranged in the coming days.
Judges on the court were expected to still work through their caseload, reading and writing opinions.
“Our judges work nights and weekends anyway,” Johnson said. “While it's a snow day for us, they are probably pretty busy.”
A winter storm warning remained in effect for Wilmington until 5 p.m. Thursday evening, and Sussex County remained under a state of emergency, with driving restrictions still in place for nonessential personnel.
Strong winds and freezing temperatures were expected to stretch into Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 2Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 3Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 4De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 5Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250