Arbitrage Fund Seeks Appraisal in Wake of $1.5B Bob Evans Merger
The Arbitrage Fund on Tuesday filed a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking appraisal of its stake in Bob Evans Farms Inc., the latest lawsuit to stem from the food producer's $1.5 billion merger with Post Holdings Inc.
January 24, 2018 at 05:38 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Susan Montgomery/Shutterstock.com
The Arbitrage Fund on Tuesday filed a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking appraisal of its stake in Bob Evans Farms Inc., the latest lawsuit to stem from the food producer's $1.5 billion merger with Post Holdings Inc.
In its petition, the Water Island Capital-backed equity mutual fund asked the Delaware court to determine the fair value of nearly 768,000 shares it says it held in Bob Evans when the deal closed Jan. 12.
Post's acquisition of Bob Evans valued the company's shares at $77 apiece.
Arbitrage Fund's appraisal action comes on the heels of an investor suit earlier this month seeking access to corporate documents to investigate potential wrongdoing in connection with the sale. In that case, Tanya E. Knight told the Chancery Court that she suspected Bob Evans' brass had folded to pressure from an activist, who had pushed for the company to be broken up and sold.
“It also appears to have been driven by the self-interests of the company's officers and directors, who stood to gain significantly more from selling the company (particularly in the manner and to the party they did) than they would have by continuing to operate the company on a standalone basis,” Knight's attorneys said in a Jan. 8 complaint.
Another investor had levied similar allegations against the Bob Evans' board in a federal securities suit last October. That case was later settled after Bob Evans agreed to provide additional disclosures related to the deal.
According to a Jan. 10 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, more than 91 percent of Bob Evans' shares voted at a special shareholder meeting were cast in favor of the merger. Under Delaware law, only dissenting investors can exercise appraisal rights.
Arbitrage Fund will likely seek additional compensation by arguing that the deal price undervalued their shares. However, it may face an uphill climb, after recent Delaware Supreme Court decisions indicated a clear preference for deal price as the best indicator of fair value in cases that involve a robust and competitive sale process.
The fund is also seeking statutory interest and costs associated with litigating its action, including an award of fees for expert witnesses and attorneys.
Arbitrage Fund listed Jessica Zeldin of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess as an attorney in the case. Attorneys for Bob Evans were not yet listed by an online docket-tracking service.
Bob Evans and Post did not immediately respond to calls requesting comment on the suit.
The case is captioned Arbitrage Fund v. Bob Evans Farms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circ Orders SEC to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250