Arbitrage Fund Seeks Appraisal in Wake of $1.5B Bob Evans Merger
The Arbitrage Fund on Tuesday filed a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking appraisal of its stake in Bob Evans Farms Inc., the latest lawsuit to stem from the food producer's $1.5 billion merger with Post Holdings Inc.
January 24, 2018 at 05:38 PM
3 minute read
Photo Credit: Susan Montgomery/Shutterstock.com
The Arbitrage Fund on Tuesday filed a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery seeking appraisal of its stake in Bob Evans Farms Inc., the latest lawsuit to stem from the food producer's $1.5 billion merger with Post Holdings Inc.
In its petition, the Water Island Capital-backed equity mutual fund asked the Delaware court to determine the fair value of nearly 768,000 shares it says it held in Bob Evans when the deal closed Jan. 12.
Post's acquisition of Bob Evans valued the company's shares at $77 apiece.
Arbitrage Fund's appraisal action comes on the heels of an investor suit earlier this month seeking access to corporate documents to investigate potential wrongdoing in connection with the sale. In that case, Tanya E. Knight told the Chancery Court that she suspected Bob Evans' brass had folded to pressure from an activist, who had pushed for the company to be broken up and sold.
“It also appears to have been driven by the self-interests of the company's officers and directors, who stood to gain significantly more from selling the company (particularly in the manner and to the party they did) than they would have by continuing to operate the company on a standalone basis,” Knight's attorneys said in a Jan. 8 complaint.
Another investor had levied similar allegations against the Bob Evans' board in a federal securities suit last October. That case was later settled after Bob Evans agreed to provide additional disclosures related to the deal.
According to a Jan. 10 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, more than 91 percent of Bob Evans' shares voted at a special shareholder meeting were cast in favor of the merger. Under Delaware law, only dissenting investors can exercise appraisal rights.
Arbitrage Fund will likely seek additional compensation by arguing that the deal price undervalued their shares. However, it may face an uphill climb, after recent Delaware Supreme Court decisions indicated a clear preference for deal price as the best indicator of fair value in cases that involve a robust and competitive sale process.
The fund is also seeking statutory interest and costs associated with litigating its action, including an award of fees for expert witnesses and attorneys.
Arbitrage Fund listed Jessica Zeldin of Rosenthal, Monhait & Goddess as an attorney in the case. Attorneys for Bob Evans were not yet listed by an online docket-tracking service.
Bob Evans and Post did not immediately respond to calls requesting comment on the suit.
The case is captioned Arbitrage Fund v. Bob Evans Farms.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 2Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 3Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 4People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250