Slights Rejects Conspiracy Allegation as 'Fantasy,' Scuttling Suit Over Russian Space Satellites
The Delaware Court of Chancery on Tuesday extinguished a decadelong civil conspiracy suit stemming from a failed partnership to commercialize Russian satellites, saying that extensive discovery had exposed the plaintiff's central theory as a sham.
January 31, 2018 at 04:27 PM
3 minute read
Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights.
The Delaware Court of Chancery on Tuesday extinguished a decadelong civil conspiracy suit stemming from a failed partnership to commercialize Russian satellites, saying that extensive discovery had exposed the plaintiff's central theory as a sham.
In a 44-page memorandum opinion, Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights III granted summary judgment to Finmeccanica SpA, nearly 11 years after plaintiff Dennis A. Reid had accused the Italian satellite-maker of forming a Delaware limited liability company in order to hijack the venture with U.S. Russian Telecommunications.
Finmeccanica denied any participation in a conspiracy and argued that the case should be dismissed because it lacked any connection to the First State. However, former Vice Chancellor John W. Noble allowed the case to proceed in 2008, sending the case careening down what Slights called a “rabbit hole to a conspiracy wonderland where the court and the parties have resided ever since.”
In a strongly worded ruling, Slights said that eight years of jurisdictional and merit discovery not only failed to produce any evidence in support of Reid's claims, but it actually showed that Reid himself had orchestrated the takeover and later tried to cover his own tracks.
“Plaintiff devised a fantasy Delaware-based conspiracy among the defendants and pled those facts in his verified complaint as a basis to argue that this court could exercise personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendants,” Slights wrote.
“It is now time to return to reality.”
Reid's case hinged on his “conspiracy theory” of personal jurisdiction, which extends a Delaware court's reach to nonresidents who take specific acts in the state to further a plot to defraud.
Reid had argued from the outset that Finmeccanica lied to the members of USRT, saying the Italian government would not contribute much-needed funding to the project unless its was controlled by Italian citizens. Finmeccanica, Reid alleged in his complaint, then formed USRT Holdings in Delaware to facilitate a coup of USRT and then deny compensation to its former members.
According to court papers, Reid had convinced Noble that the evidence would bear out his claim. But Slights, who joined the Chancery Court in 2016, said evidence from discovery showed that Reid had floated the lie about the need for Italian involvement and then coached USRT's officers on how to convince the company's members to surrender all of their equity stake, using USRT Holdings as the buyer.
Later, Reid and his cohorts severed all communications with the former members and tried to destroy the evidence of his plan, according to Slights' opinion.
“With the light of overwhelming evidence bearing down on his jurisdictional position, it is now clear that Reid misled the court by crying 'victim' of a Delaware-based conspiracy, when, in fact, he was an architect of the very wrongdoing that he claimed provided a basis for the court to exercise long-arm jurisdiction over Finmeccanica,” Slights said.
“No reasonable fact finder would conclude otherwise.”
An attorney for Reid declined to comment, and counsel for Finmeccanica did not return calls seeking comment on the ruling.
The case was captioned Reid v. Siniscalchi.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250