Prisoner Lawsuit Says Brass Ordered Beatings, Torture
An attorney for an inmate alleging constitutional violations in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center has accused top prison officials of ordering beatings and forming teams of officers to "terrorize" prisoners.
February 07, 2018 at 07:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
An attorney for an inmate alleging constitutional violations in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center has accused top prison officials of ordering beatings and forming teams of officers to “terrorize” prisoners.
The most recent filing in the case mirrors previous allegations by Donald Parkell, an inmate who claimed to have been taken hostage during the nearly 19-hour ordeal at the prison's C Building last February. But it also adds a new layer of specificity to Parkell's claims, as his legal team tries to avoid dismissal of the suit.
In a 20-page amended complaint, Parkell's attorney, James S. Green Sr., said that Delaware Department of Correction Commissioner Perry Phelps and the prison's former Wardens David Pierce and Phillip Parker directed correctional officers to assault inmates after authorities retook the facility and later formed teams of guards to “terrorize and torture” inmates.
“They gave orders to assault the inmates, deny them medical and psychiatric treatment, place them in solitary confinement, limit their food rations, and seize and destroy their personal property,” Green wrote. “Without discovery, except as reflected in the public record, plaintiff cannot know with certainty which defendant gave which order.”
Parker, who had served as deputy warden before the uprising, was named acting warden through May. Pierce, who was warden at the time of the takeover, has since been reassigned within the DOC to Dover Probation and Parole.
A spokeswoman for the DOC denied the allegations “flat-out,” but declined to comment further on the pending litigation.
Green, a partner with Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, did not immediately return a call Wednesday seeking comment.
Parkell, a medium-security inmate at the prison, filed a handwritten complaint in the weeks following the takeover, accusing state officials of creating a “toxic” environment that led to abuses. Prisoners at the Smyrna facility were unconstitutionally denied access to medical treatment and religious diets and were subjected to beatings in retaliation for the riot, which left veteran corrections officer Lt. Steven Floyd Sr. dead, Parkell said.
Later versions of the complaint alleged former Gov. Jack A. Markell had deliberately understaffed and failed to train correctional officers who worked there, resulting in a “pervasive disdain” between staff and prisoners that made the attack “predictable and inevitable.”
Attorneys from the Delaware Department of Justice moved to dismiss the proposed class action in November on the grounds of qualified and legislative immunity.
Joseph C. Handlon, deputy attorney general with the DOJ, argued in the motion that the “broad and undefined” allegations failed to link current and former state officials to the supposed wrongdoing, and the claims were too speculative to expose Markell and other officials to personal liability for alleged constitutional violations.
In Thursday's answering brief, Green said the defendants had acted with deliberate indifference to the safety of correctional officers and prisoners, and he sought to connect the officials directly to the alleged abuses.
“To compound its dereliction of duty, rather than protect plaintiff and the class of inmate victims following their retaking of Building C, the defendants punished them by beatings, torture, destruction of their property, deprivation of medical, psychiatric and dental care, and placing them in solitary confinement with no opportunity to be heard. That is what this case is about,” he said.
A total of 18 inmates have been charged in relation to the incident, and 16 are facing murder charges in Floyd's death.
Floyd's family and DOC staff injured in the ordeal settled a separate case against the state for more than $7.5 million in December.
The current case in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware is captioned Parkell v. Pierce.
It also names current JTVCC Warden Dana Metzger, Department of Safety and Homeland Security Secretary Robert Coupe and unnamed prison staff as defendants.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 2De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 3Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 4Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 5Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250