Prisoner Lawsuit Says Brass Ordered Beatings, Torture
An attorney for an inmate alleging constitutional violations in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center has accused top prison officials of ordering beatings and forming teams of officers to "terrorize" prisoners.
February 07, 2018 at 07:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
An attorney for an inmate alleging constitutional violations in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center has accused top prison officials of ordering beatings and forming teams of officers to “terrorize” prisoners.
The most recent filing in the case mirrors previous allegations by Donald Parkell, an inmate who claimed to have been taken hostage during the nearly 19-hour ordeal at the prison's C Building last February. But it also adds a new layer of specificity to Parkell's claims, as his legal team tries to avoid dismissal of the suit.
In a 20-page amended complaint, Parkell's attorney, James S. Green Sr., said that Delaware Department of Correction Commissioner Perry Phelps and the prison's former Wardens David Pierce and Phillip Parker directed correctional officers to assault inmates after authorities retook the facility and later formed teams of guards to “terrorize and torture” inmates.
“They gave orders to assault the inmates, deny them medical and psychiatric treatment, place them in solitary confinement, limit their food rations, and seize and destroy their personal property,” Green wrote. “Without discovery, except as reflected in the public record, plaintiff cannot know with certainty which defendant gave which order.”
Parker, who had served as deputy warden before the uprising, was named acting warden through May. Pierce, who was warden at the time of the takeover, has since been reassigned within the DOC to Dover Probation and Parole.
A spokeswoman for the DOC denied the allegations “flat-out,” but declined to comment further on the pending litigation.
Green, a partner with Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, did not immediately return a call Wednesday seeking comment.
Parkell, a medium-security inmate at the prison, filed a handwritten complaint in the weeks following the takeover, accusing state officials of creating a “toxic” environment that led to abuses. Prisoners at the Smyrna facility were unconstitutionally denied access to medical treatment and religious diets and were subjected to beatings in retaliation for the riot, which left veteran corrections officer Lt. Steven Floyd Sr. dead, Parkell said.
Later versions of the complaint alleged former Gov. Jack A. Markell had deliberately understaffed and failed to train correctional officers who worked there, resulting in a “pervasive disdain” between staff and prisoners that made the attack “predictable and inevitable.”
Attorneys from the Delaware Department of Justice moved to dismiss the proposed class action in November on the grounds of qualified and legislative immunity.
Joseph C. Handlon, deputy attorney general with the DOJ, argued in the motion that the “broad and undefined” allegations failed to link current and former state officials to the supposed wrongdoing, and the claims were too speculative to expose Markell and other officials to personal liability for alleged constitutional violations.
In Thursday's answering brief, Green said the defendants had acted with deliberate indifference to the safety of correctional officers and prisoners, and he sought to connect the officials directly to the alleged abuses.
“To compound its dereliction of duty, rather than protect plaintiff and the class of inmate victims following their retaking of Building C, the defendants punished them by beatings, torture, destruction of their property, deprivation of medical, psychiatric and dental care, and placing them in solitary confinement with no opportunity to be heard. That is what this case is about,” he said.
A total of 18 inmates have been charged in relation to the incident, and 16 are facing murder charges in Floyd's death.
Floyd's family and DOC staff injured in the ordeal settled a separate case against the state for more than $7.5 million in December.
The current case in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware is captioned Parkell v. Pierce.
It also names current JTVCC Warden Dana Metzger, Department of Safety and Homeland Security Secretary Robert Coupe and unnamed prison staff as defendants.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circ Orders SEC to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readWomble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250