Report Urges Overhaul of Delaware's Sexual Harassment Policies
A new report from the Delaware Department of Human Resources is calling for an overhaul to the state's sexual harassment policies after finding major gaps in existing training and prevention programs.
March 14, 2018 at 03:45 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Photo Credit: iStockphoto.comM
A new report from the Delaware Department of Human Resources is calling for an overhaul to the state's sexual harassment policies after finding major gaps in existing training and prevention programs.
According to the report, prepared by DHR Secretary Saundra Ross Johnson, only 9,000 of the approximately 14,000 executive branch employees have completed voluntary sexual harassment training since 2006, and 1,500 have failed to even acknowledge reading the current policy regarding anti-discrimination, workplace harassment and retaliation.
Released March 13, the 15-page analysis found that inconsistencies across 16 agencies have resulted in a muddled approach to handling anti-discrimination complaints and investigations. It recommended a centralized system for tracking and processing complaints and a new mandatory training regiment with periodic refreshers for all employees.
“Training must be linked to a broader communication strategy to reinforce and engage employees as to a respectful workplace,” the report said. “One of the most pervasive concerns facing employees that experience harassment is a fear of retaliation. To prevent retaliation, the state must better train employees in recognizing and preventing it.”
Gov. John Carney last March signed an executive order directing an update of the state's anti-discrimination policies. In December, he called on the DHR to conduct a review, amid a national backlash against workplace abuses sparked by the #MeToo movement.
The recommendations include consolidating two existing executive branch policies into one “concise” protocol, better communicating the policy to employees and streamlining the process for monitoring and reporting complaints.
The report also suggested that the General Assembly pass legislation requiring lobbyists, vendors and contractors doing business with the state to certify that they have similar measures in place.
A status update on the department's action plan is due to the governor by the end of the year.
In a statement, Carney said his office would “take appropriate action on all of the report's recommendations.”
“As we all know, in recent months, allegations of sexual harassment and assault in the workplace have emerged across our country,” he said. “The state of Delaware, like all employers, has an obligation to protect our employees from facing harassment and assault of any kind. That's why I asked Secretary Johnson to prepare this report, and to look at ways we can improve the state's policies and procedures.”
Johnson, who was confirmed by the state Senate to head the DHR in January, said the DHR was “committed” to implementing the report's recommendations and developing “consistent and clearly defined policies, practices and procedures.”
The General Assembly created the DHR last June in response to Carney's call to increase diversity and ensure uniform enforcement of policies.
Lawmakers in the state House of Representatives voted unanimously in January to update their own rules to define sexual harassment and outline a process for handling complaints. The Senate has yet to take up such a measure.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 2Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 3Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 4De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 5Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250