Lord & Taylor Hit With Lawsuit After Data Breach Affected More Than 5 Million Customers
The plaintiff in a proposed class action on Thursday accused high-end retailer Lord & Taylor of negligence in failing to protect its customers' private information, just days after the Hudson's Bay Co. subsidiary announced that it had been the target of a massive data breach in its North American stores.
April 06, 2018 at 03:03 PM
3 minute read
The plaintiff in a proposed class action on Thursday accused high-end retailer Lord & Taylor of negligence in failing to protect its customers' private information, just days after the Hudson's Bay Co. subsidiary announced that it had been the target of a massive data breach in its North American stores.
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleges that Lord & Taylor failed to protect its payment system in the wake of a series of high-profile breaches to hit major retailers in recent years.
According to the complaint, a criminal syndicate known as JokerStash accessed more than 5 million stolen credit cards used at Lord & Taylor and Saks Fifth Avenue stores between March 2017 and late March 2018, with plans to sell customers' sensitive information on the dark web. Hudson's Bay said it had “become aware” of the breach on Sunday, after the cybersecurity firm Gemini Advisory reported it on its blog.
“HBC has identified the issue, and has taken steps to contain it,” Hudson's Bay said in a statement. “Once the company has more clarity around the facts, it will notify customers quickly and will offer those impacted free identity protection services, including credit and web monitoring.”
Bernadette Beekman filed the proposed class action on behalf of all customers who used credit or debit cards at Lord & Taylor stores while the payment system was compromised.
Beekman's attorneys said the proposed class had overpaid Lord & Taylor for privacy protection services that weren't provided and were now forced to spend time and energy monitoring their accounts for fraudulent activity. Lord & Taylor's failure to protect confidential data, they said, had exposed its customers to increased risk of identity theft and fraud in the future.
“The security breach was caused and enabled by Lord & Taylor's knowing violation of its obligations to abide by best practices and industry standards concerning the security of payment systems,” the attorneys said in a 22-page complaint.
“Lord & Taylor failed to comply with security standards and allowed its customers' financial information and other private information to be compromised by cutting corners on security measures that could have prevented or mitigated the security breach that occurred.”
Saks, which is also owned by Hudson's Bay, was not named in the lawsuit.
A representative from the Hudson's Bay press office did not return a call Friday afternoon seeking comment. The firm has said that its customers would not be liable for fraudulent charges resulting from the breach.
The four-count complaint for negligence, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment and negligence per se is seeking actual and punitive damages, as well as attorney fees and litigation costs.
An online docket-tracking service did not list attorneys for Lord & Taylor on Friday.
Beekman and the proposed class are represented by Janine Pollack and Daniel Tepper of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz in New York, Ben Barnow and Erich Schork of Barnow and Associates in Chicago and Ralph N. Sianni in Wilmington.
A judge has not yet been assigned to the case.
The case is captioned Beekman v. Lord & Taylor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readEtsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250