Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Approves The Weinstein Co. Auction Plan
A Delaware judge has approved The Weinstein Co.'s blueprint for the bidding procedures governing the troubled movie studio's fast-tracked bankruptcy sale.
April 09, 2018 at 04:43 PM
4 minute read
A Delaware judge has approved The Weinstein Co.'s blueprint for the bidding procedures governing the troubled movie studio's fast-tracked bankruptcy sale.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath of the District of Delaware on April 6 adopted a plan from The Weinstein Co.'s bankruptcy counsel that set a May 8 hearing date on a final agreement to sell the studio's assets in the expedited Chapter 11 proceedings. According to Walrath's order, bids are due April 30, and an auction among qualified bidders has been scheduled for May 4 in the Wilmington offices of Richards, Layton & Finger.
The Weinstein Co. entered bankruptcy last month with a “stalking horse” agreement to sell its assets to Dallas-based investment firm Lantern Capital Partners for $310 million. The deal, however, is subject to better offers under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
The company's Chapter 11 petition listed both assets and liabilities between $500,000 and $1 billion, and subsequent filings have detailed mass defections and millions in lost revenue after damning allegations of sexual misconduct began to surface against Harvey Weinstein, the studio's co-founder and former president.
According to media reports, at least 80 women have so far accused Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault or harassment. The disgraced film producer was ousted from The Weinstein Co. in October, and he has since been expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in the wake of the scandal.
Harvey Weinstein has denied all allegations of nonconsensual sex.
Lantern's offer followed a breakdown in negotiations earlier this month between New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and a group of investors, spearheaded by Maria Contreras-Sweet, which had offered to assume $225 million in The Weinstein Co. debt and contribute $275 million to launch a new women-led company. Media reports had indicated that the talks included a settlement fund of up to $90 million to compensate Weinstein's victims.
Under the starting bid from Lantern, lawsuits pending against The Weinstein Co. would be halted, though the women who have sued the studio over Harvey Weinstein's alleged misconduct would be able to pursue their interests on a committee of unsecured creditors in bankruptcy.
However, Lantern could potentially face competition in the bankruptcy proceedings from prospective buyers looking to scoop up The Weinstein Co.'s legacy assets, which include a television business and a library of 277 films.
Walrath said in her order that potential buyers would have until the end of the month to submit their bids, though the deadline could be extended subject to stalking-horse agreement. Qualified bidders would be notified of their status by May 1. The Weinstein Co. is required to publish a sale notice in The Wall Street Journal or USA Today by April 11, and any counterparties must file their objections by April 30, the order said.
Walrath would need to confirm the results of the auction in the hearing, which is scheduled for 11:30 a.m. on May 8.
Walrath's order also approved stalking-horse protections for Lantern, including a 3 percent breakup fee and reimbursement of up to 1.5 percent of the cash purchase price for out-of-pocket costs, fees and expenses. Lantern would be able to petition the court for up to 2 percent reimbursement if the sale hearing does not begin as scheduled on May 8.
Objections to the proposed sale to Lantern are due April 30, and post-auction objections must be filed by May 7.
The Weinstein Co. is represented in the bankruptcy case by attorneys from Richards Layton in Wilmington and Cravath, Swaine & Moore.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHere's What Corporate Litigators Expect Delaware Courts to Address in 2025
6 minute readTesla, Musk Appeal Chancery Compensation Case to Delaware Supreme Court
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Begins 2025 With Boston Laterals and Deals
- 2Vinson & Elkins Expands Environmental Team with Chair of Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
- 3From Courtrooms to Conversations: The Unexpected Joys of Podcasting as a Lawyer
- 4'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
- 5Drake Sues UMG for Defamation Over Promotion of False Claims of Pedophilia
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250