Google Accused of Infringing Motion, Orientation Patents With Pixel Phones
A Taiwanese technology company on Monday accused Google Inc. in Delaware federal court of infringing two motion-sensing patents with its line of Pixel cellphones.
April 17, 2018 at 05:12 PM
3 minute read
Google Pixel phone. Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
A Taiwanese technology company on Monday accused Google Inc. in Delaware federal court of infringing two motion-sensing patents with its line of Pixel cellphones.
CyWee Group, which claims “one of the most significant” patent portfolios in the tech industry, said in a 40-page complaint that Google's Pixel, Pixel 2, Pixel XL and Pixel 2 XL phones use its patented systems for processing a phone's motion and orientation. The technology, CyWee said, has become central to navigation, gaming and, increasingly, augmented-and virtual reality applications for mobile devices.
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, was the latest to accuse a major American tech company of infringing CyWee's so-called '438 and '978 patents, which the company obtained in 2013. The company, which is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands but headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan, has made similar claims against other companies in Texas, Washington and California federal courts.
According to CyWee, the inventions helped to eliminate errors in earlier technology by fusing measurements collected from different types of motion sensors. For navigation and gaming applications, the company said, the improvements allow the displays on smartphone screens to automatically move or rotate while in use.
But CyWee also said that its patents were crucial to augmented reality and virtual reality applications, which typically require mobile devices to render three-dimensional images. While other methods exist for estimating orientation, many rely on cameras and vision algorithms that are not suited to most mobile users or applications, the company said.
Both patents represented a “technological solution to a technological problem,” that made them valid and patent-eligible, CyWee's attorneys at Stamoulis & Weinblatt and Shore Chan DePumpo said in the filing.
Google press representatives did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday on the allegations raised in CyWee's complaint.
The lawsuit accuses Google of direct and indirect infringement, and seeks damages, as well as a permanent injunction barring Google from making and selling any infringing devices.
Similar suits from CyWee have recently targeted Samsung, Apple Inc. and HTC Corp. According to court documents, the case against Apple was settled in 2017, while judges in Texas and Washington have allowed CyWee to amend its complaints against Samsung and HTC respectively after initially dismissing the lawsuits for faulty pleading.
In the Delaware case, CyWee is represented by Stamatios Stamoulis and Richard C. Weinblatt of Stamoulis & Weinblatt in Wilmington and Michael W. Shore, Alfonso G. Chan, Christopher Evans, Ari B. Rafilson, William D. Ellerman and Paul T. Beeler of Shore Chan in Dallas.
An online docket-tracking service did not list counsel for Google on Tuesday.
The case, captioned CyWee Group v. Google, has not yet been assigned to a judge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250