Legal Aid Groups Tout Study Showing Economic Benefits to State
Legal aid groups are touting a new study that shows a more than 700 percent return on investment for the three nonprofit agencies that provide legal services to Delaware's poor, as leaders seek to restore state funding that was slashed from last year's budget.
April 20, 2018 at 06:25 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Photo Credit: iStock
Legal aid groups are touting a new study that shows a more than 700 percent return on investment for the three nonprofit agencies that provide legal services to Delaware's poor, as leaders seek to restore state funding that was slashed from last year's budget.
Released Thursday during a Wilmington press conference, $18.1 million in state, federal and private funding for the organizations generated $149.2 million in economic benefits and averted costs between 2013 and 2015.
The independent report was commissioned by the Combined Campaign for Justice, which raises about $1 million each year to support the Community Legal Aid Society Inc., Delaware Volunteer Legal Services Inc. and Legal Services Corp. of Delaware, which serve more than 5,000 poor and disabled residents in the First State.
However, representatives said the organizations struggle to meet the needs of more than 8,300 low-income people who would qualify for services, leading to higher rates of homelessness, increased health care costs and instances of domestic abuse.
“It really is a matter of pay a little now or a lot later—investing in civil legal services is an important upstream intervention to help vulnerable populations stay housed, fed and free of domestic violence,” said Daniel G. Atkins, executive director of CLASI. “It is not a question of whether we can afford to adequately fund legal services, but rather we can't afford not to.”
The report's release comes as lawmakers in the state capital are mulling the state's budget ahead of a July 30 deadline for a final agreement on a package of spending and revenue bills for the upcoming fiscal year.
Last year's negotiations resulted in a 10 percent reduction to the $600,000 that had been allotted to the three agencies, forcing the judiciary's Administrative Office of the Courts to pick up the remainder. Civil legal aid was also hit by 20 percent across-the-board cuts to grant-in-aid spending, as the General Assembly scrambled at the last minute to close a roughly $400 million budget gap.
Atkins said he plans to use the study's results as a pitch to remind lawmakers of the social value in the services the organizations provide. He said he hopes to return to pre-2018 spending levels this year, with hopes of securing increases in spending in the future.
State funding accounts for nearly $1 million out of the approximately $7 million in a patchwork of state, federal and private dollars that fund civil legal aid each year. In addition to the money raised by the CCJ, the groups receive annual contributions from Delaware's legal and business communities and the Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts program, or IOLTA, which pools funds from short-term interest-bearing accounts that hold clients' money.
Atkins said it has been “a really good year” for private funding, thanks in part to a number of large one-time donations. CCJ also received a grant from the Longwood Foundation, which helped to fund the study, to create a professional fundraising position.
However, Atkins is expecting contributions from the federal government to remain flat, or even decline, in the coming years, and he said the study's findings show that investing in legal aid is a smart economic move for the state.
“Now's the time to make good investments. The state budget is a little looser than it's been,” Atkins said. “Don't be penny-wise and pound-foolish.”
The study, titled “Social Return on Investment From Legal Aid Services: A Statewide Analysis,” was prepared by Moravian College professor James Teufel, Mercyhurst University professor Kristofer Gossett and Robert Hayman, professor emeritus at Widener University Delaware Law School and a former staff attorney for Legal Aid of Western Missouri in Kansas City.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250