Glasscock Ruling Bolsters Former Energy Execs' Case for Damages
A Delaware Court of Chancery judge has removed a hurdle for two former executives of Louis Dreyfus Highbridge Energy to pursue potentially millions of dollars in damages stemming from the firm's $1.9 billion sale of its energy storage and processing plants in 2011.
April 25, 2018 at 06:23 PM
4 minute read
A Delaware Court of Chancery judge has removed a hurdle for two former executives of Louis Dreyfus Highbridge Energy to pursue potentially millions of dollars in damages stemming from the firm's $1.9 billion sale of its energy storage and processing plants in 2011.
Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III on Wednesday granted a request by Kevin Capone and Steven Scheinman to cancel the dissolution of two Delaware limited liability companies used to effectuate the deal, clearing the way for the plaintiffs to argue in New York state court that they are owed at least $11 million in bonuses.
Capone, former head trader for LDH Energy, and Scheinman, who served as the firm's general counsel, had sued in Delaware after a year of legal wrangling over an incentive plan, which entitled high-level employees to redeem their shares after being terminated without cause from the company.
According to court documents, Capone's stake was worth 1.5 percent of LDH Energy's value, and Scheinman was entitled to a 0.7 percent stake when the two were fired in late 2010. However, LDH redeemed their shares using a market value of $1.74 billion, a valuation that Capone and Scheinman argued undervalued the firm by at least $500 million.
In their complaint, the pair said LDH Energy knew at the time that Capone and Scheinman had a valid case for breach of contract against the company, but failed to meet a requirement under Delaware law requiring dissolving LLCs to set aside funds to satisfy known claims.
Capone and Scheinman reached their valuation based on the $1.94 billion sale of LDH Energy's midstream assets to a joint venture between Energy Transfer Partners and Regency Energy Partners in March 2011. LDH Energy was later acquired by third-party investors and renamed Castleton Commodities International in 2012.
In their lawsuit, Capone and Scheinman questioned how LDH Energy could arrive at a valuation of $1.74 billion in late 2010, when only one part of the business sold for more than $1.9 billion just months later. They said the firm and its directors had acted in bad faith by ignoring market evidence that indicated LDH Energy's value was actually much higher.
LDH Energy has said that its actions complied with Delaware law, and the company was barred from considering events after Dec. 31, 2010, in determining fair value.
The allegations also formed the basis of a breach of contract suit Capone and Scheinman filed against Castleton in New York Supreme Court in 2015. That case had been stayed, pending a ruling from Glasscock on whether LDH Energy had violated Delaware's Limited Liability Company Act by dissolving two firms without establishing a reserve of funds to cover the claims.
Capone and Scheinman asked Glasscock to nullify the LLC cancellations, so that they could proceed with their claims in New York.
On Wednesday, the judge ruled that the plaintiffs' claims “easily” had a basis in law, and LDH Energy had acted unreasonably in not establishing a reserve.
“Because the defendants were aware at the time of dissolution of the plaintiffs' nonfrivolous claims against the LLCs for breach of contract, the LLC Act required creation of a reserve to cover the plaintiffs' claims. It is undisputed that the defendants failed to do that,” Glasscock wrote in a 39-page memorandum opinion. “Accordingly, the LLCs were dissolved in violation of [the LLC Act], and the certificates of cancellation shall be nullified.”
Attorneys for the LDH Energy and Castleton did not return calls Wednesday seeking comment on the ruling. A Castleton spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.
Plaintiffs counsel were not available to comment on Wednesday.
Capone and Scheinman were represented by Brendan V. Sullivan Jr., Stephen L. Urbanczyk, Paul Mogin, Steven M. Cady and Matthew H. Blumenstein of Williams & Connolly in Washington, D.C., and Daniel A. Dreisbach and Ryan P. Durkin of Richards, Layton & Finger in Wilmington.
LDH Energy and Castleton were represented by Andrew Ditchfield, David B. Toscano, Edward Fu and Sagar D. Thakur of Davis Polk & Wardwell in New York and Donald J. Wolfe Jr., T. Brad Davey and Seth R. Tangman of Potter Anderson & Corroon in Wilmington.
The Delaware case is captioned Capone v. LDH Management Holdings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChancery Court Exercises Discretion in Setting Bond in a Case Involving Share Transfer Restriction
6 minute readSEC Calls Terraform's Dentons Retainer 'Opaque Slush Fund' in Bankruptcy Court
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250