Judge Approves Weinstein Co. Bankruptcy Sale to Texas-Based Investors
A Delaware bankruptcy judge on Tuesday approved the $310 million sale of The Weinstein Co.'s television and film assets to Dallas-based Lantern Capital Partners.
May 08, 2018 at 06:29 PM
3 minute read
Harvey Weinstein. Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
A Delaware bankruptcy judge on Tuesday approved the $310 million sale of The Weinstein Co.'s television and film assets to Dallas-based Lantern Capital Partners.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Mary F. Walrath of the District of Delaware said she would sign off on the agreement during a scheduled hearing in Wilmington, allowing the embattled studio to emerge from bankruptcy under new leadership.
The development, however, was the latest blow to women who had hoped to recover against the company for abuses suffered at the hands of company co-founder Harvey Weinstein, who has been accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women.
Lantern, a private equity firm, emerged as The Weinstein Co.'s likely buyer last week, after other potential acquirers balked during a court-ordered bidding process.
Lantern, whose cash offer also included the assumption of some of the studio's debt, was considered the front-runner to scoop up The Weinstein Co.'s assets when the studio filed for Chapter 11 protection in March. The agreement, however, was subject to better offers and required Walrath's signature.
On May 1, The Weinstein Co.'s Richards, Layton & Finger and Cravath, Swaine & Moore attorneys said that no other bidders had topped Lantern's offer, and a planned auction—which had been scheduled for May 4—was canceled.
The proceeds from the sale will be used to pay back at least $345 million in secured debt The Weinstein Co. owes to banks and other financial institutions that had lent the studio money.
It is not yet clear whether Harvey Weinstein's accusers will receive any funds from the sale. Typically, people with legal claims against a bankrupt company are given lower priority than the firm's secured creditors, and experts have doubted whether there would be enough money at play for the women to recover in bankruptcy.
The accusers, however, are expected to pursue their claims individually against Harvey Weinstein and those associated with the studio.
The Weinstein Co. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy March 19, amid a national backlash over allegations that Harvey Weinstein had sexually abused and assaulted women in the entertainment industry for years. In court filings, the studio said it had lost 25 percent of its workforce and millions of dollars in production and distribution agreements since the scandal surfaced in October.
Harvey Weinstein has denied allegations of nonconsensual sex. He was fired from the company last October and was expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences in the wake of the scandal.
So far, more than 80 women have come forward to accuse Weinstein of sexual misconduct.
At least nine women have accused The Weinstein Co. in lawsuits of enabling Weinstein's alleged pattern of predatory behavior. Those lawsuits have been halted during the bankruptcy proceedings. Now that the sale has been approved, Lantern is free of any legal liability currently pending against the company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readPrivate Equity Firm's Counsel to Del. Supreme Court: Forfeiture Provisions Present 'a Choice'
4 minute readDavis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250