Del. Judge Grants $41,000 in Attorney Fees to Drinker Biddle in Contract Dispute
A Delaware Superior Court judge has awarded Drinker Biddle & Reath $41,000 in attorney fees for recovering $1 million on behalf of its clients in a breach of contract case against Texas-based machining services firm Integra Services Technologies Inc.
June 25, 2018 at 06:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
A Delaware Superior Court judge has awarded Drinker Biddle & Reath $41,000 in attorney fees for recovering $1 million on behalf of its clients in a breach of contract case against Texas-based machining services firm Integra Services Technologies Inc.
The ruling from Judge Paul R. Wallace resolved a $6,000 difference between both sides as to how much Drinker Biddle attorneys Todd C. Schiltz and Stephen S. Herst were owed for successfully litigating the case. In February, Wallace granted the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and ordered Integra to pay Dean Bellmoff and Beatrice Salazar the remaining balance on two promissory notes, which originally came due in August 2017.
In the months that followed, however, the parties failed to reach an agreement on reasonable attorney fees, leaving the issue up to Wallace to decide.
Bellmoff and Salazar, who each formerly owned a 25 percent stake in Integra, had argued they were entitled to $41,000 to pay Schiltz and Herst for the 68 total hours they had worked on the case. Integra and its Hogan McDaniel attorneys countered that the request was excessive in comparison to its own legal costs of roughly $32,000, and asked the court to approve no more than $35,000 to its opponents.
On June 22, Wallace said the discrepancy stemmed from an 11-hour gap in the time each legal team spent working on the case, and he cited to Delaware's so-called “pizza principle,” which holds that “it is more time consuming to clean up the pizza thrown at the wall than it is to throw it.”
“No doubt, Bellmoff and Salazar's counsel had to spend time cleaning up Integra's thrown pizza: reviewing and responding to each of the affirmative defenses Integra chucked in to the litigation,” he wrote in an eight-page memorandum opinion and order.
In his ruling, Wallace refused to conduct an hour-by-hour accounting of Drinker Biddle's work, but said the request from Bellmoff and Salazar was reasonable in light of the services rendered throughout the eight-month case.
“In sum, their counsel successfully secured a million-dollar award and charged less than 5 percent of that sum to do so,” Wallace wrote. “Not bad. Certainly not unreasonable.”
Schiltz, a partner in Drinker Biddle's Wilmington office, did not return a call Monday afternoon seeking comment on the case. Attorneys for Integra were not immediately available to comment.
Integra was represented by Ronald R. Rossi of Kasowitz Benson Torres in New York and Garvan F. McDaniel of Hogan McDaniel in Wilmington.
The case was captioned Bellmoff v. Integra Services Technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circ Orders SEC to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
5 minute readWomble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Am Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
- 2K&L Gates Files String of Suits Against Electronics Manufacturer's Competitors, Brightness Misrepresentations
- 3'Better of the Split': District Judge Weighs Circuit Divide in Considering Who Pays Decades-Old Medical Bill
- 4Which Georgia Courts Are Closed Today?—Here's a List
- 5After DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250