Stark Authorizes Seizure of Citgo Shares in $1.2B Venezuela Arbitration Dispute
A federal judge found Citgo's owner acted as an “alter ego” of the Venezuelan government.
August 14, 2018 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
A Delaware federal judge has allowed Crystallex International Corp. to seize shares of Citgo Petroleum Corp., granting the Canadian gold producer's request to prevent Venezuela from avoiding a $1.2 billion arbitration award over lost mineral rights.
The ruling, initially filed under seal Aug. 10 by U.S. District Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware, entered a writ of attachment for shares of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., Venezuela's national oil company, which owns Citgo in the United States—the latest development in a messy international dispute that has bounced around the federal courts for years.
In a 75-page opinion, Stark said that PDVSA acted as an “alter ego” of the Venezuelan government, which had exerted extensive control over the company's business operations. The ruling pointed to a number of official actions Venezuela had taken through PDVSA, including using its planes to transport politicians and using the company as a vehicle to raise funds.
Current Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro had also dictated the appointment of directors, vice presidents and members of the firm's shareholder council, Stark said. And the country's former leader, Hugo Chávez, even fired company officials on national television for opposing the government's policies, according to the opinion.
In an accompanying order, Stark directed the parties to meet this week to outline how the sale of the Citgo shares should proceed, and whether it would require the approval of the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions.
Venezuela has said in court papers that it plans to appeal.
Crystallex filed its motion for a writ of attachment in August 2017, after Venezuela failed to pay a $1.2 billion arbitration award for improperly terminating the Canadian company's rights to an untapped gold reserve amid a push to nationalize its gold mines.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia confirmed the arbitration award in 2017. However, Crystallex's previous attempt to recover against PDVSA under the Delaware Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act fell flat after an appeals court tossed the case in January.
Crystallex argued in the attachment case that Venezuela used its shares to PDV Holding Inc., a Delaware company, for commercial activity in the United States by exerting its rights as a shareholder to conduct business through Citgo, the company's wholly owned subsidiary.
“It is difficult to imagine a property with more of a commercial use than shares of a Delaware for-profit corporation that itself owns, through an intermediate holding company, a multibillion-dollar Delaware petroleum corporation,” Crystallex had argued in court papers, according to the opinion.
PDVSA intervened in the dispute and argued that Venezuela's control of PDVSA and its assets constituted ordinary government regulations. According to PDVSA, shares in the American subsidiary were “effectively frozen” and couldn't be used for commercial activity.
Stark, however, sided with Crystallex, citing evidence that Venezuela was deeply involved in the day-to-day operations of PDVSA.
“Specifically, Venezuela—through PDVSA—uses the shares to appoint directors, approve contracts and pledge assets as security for PDVSA's debt,” he wrote.
“The court finds by a preponderance of evidence that the PDVH shares are being 'used for a commercial purpose' by PDVSA and, therefore, may be attached (and executed on) as property of Venezuela's alter ego.”
Both sides have until Thursday to detail “next steps” in the litigation, according to the ruling.
Crystallex is represented by Robert L. Weigel, Jason W. Myatt, Rahim Moloo and Miguel A. Estrada of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's New York and Washington, D.C., offices. Raymond J. DiCamillo, Jeffrey L. Moyer and Travis S. Hunter of Richards, Layton & Finger are acting as local counsel.
PDVSA is represented by Joseph D. Pizzurro, Kevin A. Meehan, Julia B. Mosse and Juan Perla of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle in New York and Samuel T. Hirzel II of Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel in Wilmington.
The case is captioned Crystallex International v. Venezuela.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readEtsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
Trending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 2Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 3A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
- 4Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 5Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250