Stark Authorizes Seizure of Citgo Shares in $1.2B Venezuela Arbitration Dispute
A federal judge found Citgo's owner acted as an “alter ego” of the Venezuelan government.
August 14, 2018 at 03:36 PM
4 minute read
A Delaware federal judge has allowed Crystallex International Corp. to seize shares of Citgo Petroleum Corp., granting the Canadian gold producer's request to prevent Venezuela from avoiding a $1.2 billion arbitration award over lost mineral rights.
The ruling, initially filed under seal Aug. 10 by U.S. District Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware, entered a writ of attachment for shares of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., Venezuela's national oil company, which owns Citgo in the United States—the latest development in a messy international dispute that has bounced around the federal courts for years.
In a 75-page opinion, Stark said that PDVSA acted as an “alter ego” of the Venezuelan government, which had exerted extensive control over the company's business operations. The ruling pointed to a number of official actions Venezuela had taken through PDVSA, including using its planes to transport politicians and using the company as a vehicle to raise funds.
Current Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro had also dictated the appointment of directors, vice presidents and members of the firm's shareholder council, Stark said. And the country's former leader, Hugo Chávez, even fired company officials on national television for opposing the government's policies, according to the opinion.
In an accompanying order, Stark directed the parties to meet this week to outline how the sale of the Citgo shares should proceed, and whether it would require the approval of the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, which administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions.
Venezuela has said in court papers that it plans to appeal.
Crystallex filed its motion for a writ of attachment in August 2017, after Venezuela failed to pay a $1.2 billion arbitration award for improperly terminating the Canadian company's rights to an untapped gold reserve amid a push to nationalize its gold mines.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia confirmed the arbitration award in 2017. However, Crystallex's previous attempt to recover against PDVSA under the Delaware Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act fell flat after an appeals court tossed the case in January.
Crystallex argued in the attachment case that Venezuela used its shares to PDV Holding Inc., a Delaware company, for commercial activity in the United States by exerting its rights as a shareholder to conduct business through Citgo, the company's wholly owned subsidiary.
“It is difficult to imagine a property with more of a commercial use than shares of a Delaware for-profit corporation that itself owns, through an intermediate holding company, a multibillion-dollar Delaware petroleum corporation,” Crystallex had argued in court papers, according to the opinion.
PDVSA intervened in the dispute and argued that Venezuela's control of PDVSA and its assets constituted ordinary government regulations. According to PDVSA, shares in the American subsidiary were “effectively frozen” and couldn't be used for commercial activity.
Stark, however, sided with Crystallex, citing evidence that Venezuela was deeply involved in the day-to-day operations of PDVSA.
“Specifically, Venezuela—through PDVSA—uses the shares to appoint directors, approve contracts and pledge assets as security for PDVSA's debt,” he wrote.
“The court finds by a preponderance of evidence that the PDVH shares are being 'used for a commercial purpose' by PDVSA and, therefore, may be attached (and executed on) as property of Venezuela's alter ego.”
Both sides have until Thursday to detail “next steps” in the litigation, according to the ruling.
Crystallex is represented by Robert L. Weigel, Jason W. Myatt, Rahim Moloo and Miguel A. Estrada of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher's New York and Washington, D.C., offices. Raymond J. DiCamillo, Jeffrey L. Moyer and Travis S. Hunter of Richards, Layton & Finger are acting as local counsel.
PDVSA is represented by Joseph D. Pizzurro, Kevin A. Meehan, Julia B. Mosse and Juan Perla of Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle in New York and Samuel T. Hirzel II of Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel in Wilmington.
The case is captioned Crystallex International v. Venezuela.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Finnegan Win $115M Muscular Dystrophy Drug Patent Verdict for Counterclaimant
2 minute readDelaware Supreme Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of Case Law on Anticompetition Provisions
3 minute read3rd Circuit Nominee Mangi Sees 'No Pathway to Confirmation,' Derides 'Organized Smear Campaign'
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250