Del. Officials Seek Dismissal of Last-Chance Federal Suit Alleging Abuse of Prisoners
Attorneys from the Delaware Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal judge to dismiss the remaining claims in a prisoner lawsuit accusing state officials of abuses in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center.
August 24, 2018 at 05:05 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Delaware Law Weekly
Attorneys from the Delaware Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal judge to dismiss the remaining claims in a prisoner lawsuit accusing state officials of abuses in the wake of last year's deadly uprising at James T. Vaughn Correctional Center.
The filing came in response to inmate Donald Parkell's latest—and likely final—attempt to hold two JTVCC wardens and commissioners of the Delaware Department of Corrections responsible for the aftermath of the February 2017 incident, which left one corrections officer dead and two others injured.
U.S. District Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark of the District of Delaware in June rejected the bulk of Parkell's claims, but allowed him to amend his complaint for a fourth and final time.
Parkell, who was housed in the prison's C Building at the time of the inmate takeover, in July dropped his claims against former Delaware Gov. Jack Markell and Dana Metzger, who took over as warden of JTVCC last may. However, the revised complaint continued to allege that staff at the prison “were permitted to and encouraged to abuse prisoners” in retaliation for the riot.
Parkell also added new allegations that former Warden David Pierce and former DOC Commissioner Robert Coupe placed inmates and guards at risk by deliberately undermining a 2016 settlement requiring increased security, better mental health services at the prison and more out-of-cell time for prisoners placed in restrictive housing.
According to the complaint, the two officials created a “volatile mix” of mentally ill inmates and rival gang members in the recreation yard, which paved the way for a “mass movement” among prisoners.
“The actions and inactions of Coupe and Pierce demonstrate a conspiracy to cause the implementation of the CLASI order to fail, and to seriously jeopardize the safety and security of the staff and inmates in the process,” Parkell's attorney James S. Green Sr. said, referencing the Community Legal Aid Society Inc. agreement.
On Friday, Joseph C. Handlon, head of the DOJ's Defensive Litigation Unit, bashed the latest allegation as “astounding,” saying that Pierce and Coupe had acted reasonably in trying to comply with the CLASI order and challenged the connection Parkell drew between the two.
“The foreseeability of the riot in connection with the implementation of the CLASI order is especially questionable because the CLASI order did not pertain to C Building, where the riot occurred,” Handlon wrote in a six-page motion to dismiss.
Handlon also argued in the filing that Parkell had failed to state constitutional claims to overcome the doctrine of qualified immunity, which shields government officials from liability for actions taken in their official capacity.
Parkell, a medium-security inmate at the prison, initially filed a handwritten complaint in the weeks following the takeover, accusing state officials of creating a “toxic” environment that led to abuses. Green, a partner with Seitz, Van Ogtrop & Green, later signed on to represent Parkell, after Stark deemed the allegations serious enough to warrant the appointment of counsel.
Later versions of the complaint accused Markell of deliberately understaffing the prison and failing to train correctional officers who worked there, resulting in a “pervasive disdain” between staff and prisoners that made the attack “predictable and inevitable.”
In June, Stark ruled that Markell, who left office in January 2017, was immune from the lawsuit and he rejected Parkell's claims for failure to train and supervise prison staff. Stark also ruled that Parkell lacked standing to claim that officials had ordered beatings because Parkell had said in court documents that he was not injured himself.
The latest version of the complaint includes one count under federal law for failure to protect against Pierce, Coupe and Deputy Warden Philip Parker and a second count for cruel and unusual punishment against Pierce and Parker.
The case, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, is captioned Parkell v. Pierce.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readEtsy App Infringes on Storage, Retrieval Patents, New Suit Claims
Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Lookback Window' Law for Child Abuse Cases Constitutional, State High Court Finds
- 2Troutman Pepper Says Ex-Associate Who Alleged Racial Discrimination Lost Job Because of Failure to Improve
- 3Texas Bankruptcy Judge Withdraws Ethics Complaint Against Jackson Walker
- 4Apply Now: Superior Court Judge Sought for Mountain Judicial Circuit Bench
- 5Harrisburg Jury Hands Up $1.5M Verdict to Teen Struck by Underinsured Driver
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250